Category: personal_noteS

New Foreign Investment Law, Boao Forum for Asia 2019 And China Development Forum 2019

Following the closing (March 15) of National People’s Congress (NPC)’ 2019 annual meeting in Beijing, two important annual forums were held – China Development Forum 2019 (March and Boao Forum for Asia 2019

One of the major progress made during NPC’s annual meeting is the approval of the new foreign investment law #中华人民共和国外商投资法 (original link here)

The law was first introduced as a draft in 2015 and will come into effect on January 1, 2020.

The new foreign investment law will replace the “three foreign capital laws” – Law on Sino-Foreign Equity Joint Ventures #中外合资经营企业法, Law on Foreign-Capital Enterprises #外资企业法 and Law on Sino-Foreign Cooperative Joint Ventures #中外合作经营企业法, which were introduced in 1979, 1986 and 1988 respectively. They were updated along the way but structural/fundamental changes won’t be easy. (you can’t expect a law to be efficient and perfect after 30-40 years.. in a fast-changing environment)

China Development Forum is more focused on China. And of course, the newly-passed foreign investment law was discussed and introduced to all the CEOs/managements from foreign companies among others.

Again, on Boao Forum For Asia, Premier Li Keqiang reemphasized the plan to make detailed regulations to enforce the effective implementation of the foreign investment law.

Updates:

Recently adjusted (cut) government subsidies for electric EV in China

EV is probably one of the most mature new market. It is still something new for most families, but it seems to me that the global EV technology readiness is pretty much similar to that of iPhone in 2013-2015 (iPhone 5S – iPhone 6S).

The industry is more likely to make incremental improvements over the next decade. It won’t be easy in terms of technological progress; it will also need much more effort/thinking in terms of commercial strategies.

One of the latest sign is the most recent subsidy cut for “new energy vehicles”, dated March 26 in Beijing #财建〔2019〕138号.

The reduction in subsidies has been outlined as early as April 2015 #财建〔2015〕134号, in which 1. the subsidies for 2016 was announced and 2. projected that certain vehicles’ 2017-2018 subsidies shall be 20% lower & 3. 2019-2020 subsidies shall be 40% lower, among other things.

2017－2020年除燃料电池汽车外其他车型补助标准适当退坡，其中：2017－2018年补助标准在2016年基础上下降20%，2019－2020年补助标准在2016年基础上下降40%。

#财建〔2015〕134号

Here is the list of updates in the following years:

#财建〔2016〕958号 – Announced Dec 30, 2016; Effective Jan 1, 2017

#财建〔2018〕18号 – Announced Feb 12, 2018; Effective Feb 12, 2018; Grace Period till Jun 11, 2018, during which passengers would follow the previous program x 40%, trucks would follow the previous program x 70%, fuel cells would follow the previous program

#财建〔2019〕138号 – Announced Mar 26, 2019; Effective Mar 26, 2019; Grace Period till Jun 25, 2019, during which vehicles unqualified for 2019 standard shall follow previous program x 10%, qualified for 2019 standard shall follow previous program x 60%, policies for fuel cells and buses will announce separately

A summary of national government (not including regional) subsidy base for battery electric vehicles

More restrictions are added in 2018 and 2019, especially in terms of technical standards.

Smaller EV manufacturers with little R&D resources will need to restructure or pivot. Profitability will be an issue for many companies; but a needed test to form a mature market that can run itself and benefit most stakeholders.

An Eventful Tuesday: Tech Companies Stealing Each Other’s Thunder

Many tech-related announcements/events is happening on March 19. Coincidence? or a colluded effort to steal someone’s thunder…

So we have…

Apple announcing several updates on its hardwares, from iPad yesterday to today’s iMac.

And Facebook (Instagram) + PayPal collaboration bringing the next-level integration of social medial + e-commerce. [also mentioned in what’s next in retailing in China] The collaboration won’t be limited to Instagram and will be part of Facebook’s push to payments while Facebook Pay in its messenger app is not doing well enough. And for PayPal, this is a major victory to reinforce its presence in online payments and business collaboration.

And Google unveiled its upcoming gaming-streaming service, Stadia, on the Game Developers Conference today. Originally announced as Project Stream, it will compete directly with Microsoft, Nintendo, Apple and others in the future battleground of gaming: cloud. [Video, Project Stream]

Meanwhile, Jeff Bezos is hosting an exclusive hard-tech party in Palm Spring called MARS, focusing on robots and other cutting-edge engineering demos.

Pokemon GO Rises Again

It seems to some that the Pokemon GO fever was in 2016-ish and has lost the momentum.

It seems to me though, the game has never been dead and might be the first AR mobile game platform with a massive user base [and to introduce a new way of social interaction/entertainment]

Actually the company behind the game, Niantic, just raised $245 million at a nearly $4 billion valuation in January.

So what is new for Pokémon GO if it is not dead.

Social features.

1. Pokémon GO introduces friends features that can send daily gifts to each other and trade pokemons. Making friends and leveling up the friendship level will earn lots of exp. In September 2018, Niantic said “more than 113 million Friend connections have been made and 2.2 billion Gifts have been sent to friends” since the end of June (in two month total)

2. Gym system reworked to encourage team play (June 2017) + raid boss introduced at gym (July 2017). Gyms are where trainers use Pokémon’s to defend/attack and essentially defending a gym will need more legitimate teamwork. (Less of a broken gym system before) The raid system is a smart design. Legendary Pokémon raids reengaged many players. The most recent Rayquaza raid is high expected (should give Pokémon Go some good statistics to show growth/relevance).

3. Battle system. Although introduced before, it was improved recently. All skill sets now have two numbers: damage in gyms and damage in battle. It will be much more raiser to design a balanced battle system now. And that will be the basis of Pokémon tournament/E-sport.

4. AR photos. The system is working well and has a lot more features to add. I could imagine many fun photos can be taken with Pokémon’s in real world settings. Also, taking a selfie with legendary Pokémon’s will give a sense of achievement and more purpose of playing. Moreover, it could be fun with multiple players/pokemons at the same place and more natural interactions implemented.

Strong IP is such a valuable asset.

Pokemon GO park (like a Disneyland, smaller) would be very doable. It might be the first AR park to be built. More fun in the park with AR glasses and phones.

Some more social community events could be designed. It has already incorporated events that celebrate holidays around the world. Pokémon GO could be a lifestyle. (A healthy one in terms of all the walking)

Boeing…

Twin Accidents

  1. On October 29, 2018, Lion Air Flight 610, a 737 MAX 8 registration PK-LQP, crashed into the Java Sea 13 minutes after takeoff, killing all 189 passengers and crew.
  2. On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, a 737 MAX 8 registration ET-AVJ, crashed approximately 6 minutes after takeoff, killing all 149 passengers and 8 crew members on board.

Countries Ordered Grounding

  • On March 11, 2019, China was the first country to order all 96 of its 737 MAX aircraft grounded
  • On March 12, 2019, Europe and India join wave of countries grounding the 737 Max
  • On March 13, 2019, U.S. regulators joined the global chorus by grounding the plane
Source: bbc.com

Undelivered Orders

Boeing produces 52 aircraft per month and its newest version, the MAX, represents the lion’s share of production, although Boeing declined to break out exact numbers. [oann.com]

As of January 2019, Boeing had 5,011 firm orders from 78 identified customers for the 737 MAX. The top three identified airline customers for the 737 MAX are Southwest Airlines with 280 orders, Flydubai with 251 orders, and Lion Air with 201 orders. [Wikipedia]

Source: Wikipedia

The order book for its 737 Max is worth more than $600 billion according to Bloomberg.

Boeing’s stock closed at $422.54 per share before the accident and closed at $377.14 per share on March 11. ( -10.74%, after 3 days and all major markets grounded the plane)

With its 564.99M shares outstanding, the market value decreased by ~$25.8 billion. It seems that investors are more optimistic than I thought. With immediate delivery delayed/cancelled, the order value should shrink by a lot (50% discount * 10% profit * $600 billion = $30 billion; 2018 total net income ~$10 billion), plus the future loss of revenue on maintenance, loss of orders/bargain power due to the trust/brand damage.

Airlines may just switch to Boeing’s other aircrafts tho.

 

Tech Companies = Governments

This will be a large topic and won’t be easy to discuss in a systematic way. I will write down some thoughts in bullet points and revisit later.

  • The idea has occurred to me several times. Essentially, government is an organization and so does a company. Although organizations have different scopes, different formats of running, there must be some similarities.
  • We usually say companies are to maximize shareholders’ value (short-run and long-run). But when the long-run is long enough, we shall see something interesting: the companies are paying extreme attention to building an ecosystem, to maintaining a healthy community/marketplace, to maximizing users’ satisfaction, etc.
  • Tech companies very much rely on users’ opinion. They listen to users. Users have the option to walk away just like immigration. Tech companies need users’ inputs/choices to build apps they use, to maintain the virtual world they live. The self-governance is impressive, especially in blockchain-based applications that users can decide/vote.
  • Tech companies are responsible to protect users from malware or harmful contents/users. They can block an IP address or a user account just like putting someone into prison. They can reject his/her entrance into the community.
  • Tech companies have their own rules or bottom lines that act as laws/judges, with the help of self-governance.
  • There are many free services as long as you are one of its users (or citizens)
  • They provide infrastructures and ways to interact (emails, postal services, freeways)
  • Users pay taxes such as data. In other cases, users share what they earned through tech companies (e.g. marketplace organizers by them)

FDA’s Updated Biosimilars Naming Policy

Two days after Mr. Gottlieb announced his departure from the FDA within a month on March 5, he released an updated draft guidance on biologics naming policy, adding another accomplishment in the last month of his tenure.

The question at the core is how to market “generic versions” of biologics, aka biosimilars. Unlike generic versions of traditional drugs, which could achieve a very confident level of equivalence to their original forms, the difference between biosimilars and their originals are “theoretically” high.

A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an existing FDA-approved reference product.

– FDA

The naming policy comes into play to assert that difference.

For interchangeable biosimilars, the agency will designate a proper name that combines the core name and a distinguishing suffix that is devoid of meaning and composed of 4 lowercase letters.

– FDA

It is another confirmation that, biosimilars will not provide the similar competition as generics [to traditional drugs].

Biosimilars can be seen as lower-priced branded drugs. And it will really need real-world experiences to tell the interchangeability and other considerations.

A new biosimilar approval could be seen as providing a new solution, instead of providing a less expensive version of the current solution, to patients.

MSCI China A Shares Inclusion (2): 253 Large-cap and 168 Mid-cap

Following up on the previous post of MSCI’s inclusion of 236 China A Shares last year, I created another list (in excel format) according to the recent update.

MSCI A-share List_2019Feb

MSCI will increase the weight of China A shares in the MSCI Indexes according to the following schedule:

  • Step 1: MSCI will increase the index inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 5% to 10% and add ChiNext Large Cap shares with a 10% inclusion factor coinciding with the May 2019 Semi Annual Index Review.
  • Step 2: MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 10% to 15% coinciding with the August 2019 Quarterly Index Review.
  • Step 3: MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 15% to 20% and add China A Mid Cap shares, including eligible ChiNext shares, with a 20% inclusion factor to the MSCI Indexes coinciding with the November 2019 Semi-Annual Index Review.

On completion of this three-step implementation, there will be 253 Large and 168 Mid Cap China A shares, including 27 ChiNext shares, on a pro forma basis in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, representing a weight of 3.3% in the pro forma index.

Again, there is no clear/editable list publicly available… Always a list in jpeg/png format.

Compared to the list of 236 large-cap stocks last year, there are 24 additions and 7 deletions, listed in separate sheets. (236+24-7=253)

 

MSCI China A Shares Inclusion (1): 234 -> 226 -> 236 Large-cap

One thing I found very odd when doing some research on the recent inclusion of China’s A-shares into MSCI’s indexes – there is even no easily-accessible and “readable” list…

“Lists” I saw are in the format of pictures.. not usable, considering the number of stocks are in hundreds.

(Really don’t understand why a simple list is protected… and available in uneditable form…)

And there is no consistent track of inclusion/exclusion of stocks publicly available.

Given that, I created excel lists [MSCI China A Shares List] of tickers proposed by MSCI with a history of different versions in 2018.

[For 2019 versions, please see the next post]

In this post, three versions are shared:

  1. 5/15/2018 version with 234 stocks ->
  2. 5/31/2018 version with 226 stocks (8 are removed due to reasons like suspension of trading, lack of buying opportunity, etc.) ->
  3. 8/31/2018 version with 236 stocks (10 are added)

From 1 to 2, the 8 deleted stocks are:

  • 002310 东方园林 (停牌原因)
  • 600170 上海建工 (调出沪股通标的)
  • 601390 中国中铁 (停牌原因)
  • 600369 西南证券 (调出沪股通标的)
  • 002450 ST康得新 (停牌原因)
  • 000825 太钢不锈 (停牌原因)
  • 601118 海南橡胶 (调出沪股通标的, 停牌原因)
  • 000063 中兴通讯 (停牌原因)

From 2 to 3, the 10 added stocks are:

  • 600760 中航沈飞
  • 601088 中国神华
  • 600050 中国联通
  • 600795 国电电力
  • 600346 恒力股份
  • 600406 国电南瑞
  • 000100 TCL 集团
  • 000063 中兴通讯
  • 600588 用友网络
  • 601966 玲珑轮胎

Mark Zuckerberg’s Post on Privacy

Today, the person at the center of today’s privacy/data issues commented with his thoughts and future moves of Facebook.

[Read Zuckerberg’s original post here]

End-to-end encryption and secure data centers are the two most important things touted by Facebook’s CEO.

“In a few years, I expect future versions of Messenger and WhatsApp to become the main ways people communicate on the Facebook network.”

[WhatsApp is the leader in end-to-end encryption and was acquired by Facebook in 2014 for $22 billion total]

[Read more on the conflict between Facebook and WhatsApp after acquisition]

However, there is one big mismatch – users don’t care what technics FB is using; they care if people they don’t know know them well. Essentially, users will still feel their information is sold if they saw tailored ads in WhatsApp. They only care about results. And that’s where Apple’s iMessenger wins. Users don’t know what efforts Apple is making but they don’t see ads.

What’s more…

“Beyond that, significant thought needs to go into all of the services we build on top of that foundation — from how people do payments and financial transactions, to the role of businesses and advertising, to how we can offer a platform for other private services.”

Yes Facebook will do payments and issue blockchain-related or other forms of cryptocurrencies/units.