SoftBank Has An Easy Strategy – Mobile Payment In Every Emerging Economy

SoftBank might be the investment firm outside of China that understands mobile payments the best.

Tapping Ant Financial and Tencent’s interests in overseas markets, SoftBank has investments in every major emerging economy.

Southeast Asia: Grab

SoftBank inject another $2 billion earlier this year into Grab. It first invested in GrabTaxi back in 2014 with $250 million Series D, making itself the largest shareholder. GrabTaxi then rebranded into Grab in 2016, entering into payment service with GrabPay and other businesses. It also acquired Kudo based in  Indonesia in 2017 to beef up its payment platform.

[Also, in July, Softbank’s Vision Fund and GIC invested $300 million in e-wallet VNPAY’s parent company for Vietnam]

India: Paytm

This week, SoftBank and Ant Financial injected $1 billion into Paytm. The competition intensifies with Google Pay, payments from e-commerce and Facebook’s payment especially on WhatsApp.

Argentina: Ualá

On November 25, Ualá raised a $150 million Series C led by Tencent and SoftBank. Ualá is a mobile banking tech platform and allows users to transfer money, invest in mutual funds, request loans, pay bills and top-up prepaid services.

Mexico: Clip

SoftBank invested $20 million in Clip, leading a $100 million round in May. Clip offers Square-like products for merchant payments, as the country is more relying on cards.

Updates – Mexico: Konfio

On December 3, SoftBank invested $100 million into Konfio, which provides credit underwriting, or SMB loans.

Combining Konfio and Clip will create the Square or Clover in Mexico.


An easy model and bet on those economies.

How Card Networks May Fail: Top Merchants With Gift Cards + Mobile Wallet

In the US, as top merchants getting bigger, they are able to drive the adoption of cash-like mobile wallets, internalizing more transaction infrastructure, cutting payment networks’ growth & profitability.

We have already seen the success of Starbucks’s mobile order & pay, launched at the end of 2014. The combination of its mobile app, (gift) cards and cash-like value in the app reduces the overall transactions costs of Starbucks purchases. Other benefits like managing the loyalty program and mobile orders/pick-ups makes it the role model that big merchants (like Walmart) wants to follow.

Currently, some merchants are offering co-branded credit cards at the same time. But I think the long-term goal is to promote the usage of their own mobile app and cash (e.g. Starbucks credit card comes with an annual fee that I think is discouraging people from using the card in the long-term but can be used as a market tool for now). They can reduce (most of) the transaction costs and own the data (e.g. payment networks can only touch the reloading part of Uber Cash, but not the transactions made via Uber Cash – no fees, no data).

Luckin Coffee (3)

Previous post on growth in stores and per store/unit growth.


Now here are some number about the coffee market in the US.

  • 64% of American adults consume coffee every day
  • An average American drinks 3.1 cups of coffee per day
  • Americans drink about 400 million cups of coffee every day
  • Americans drink about 146 billion cups of coffee annually
  • 65% of US adults drink coffee with their breakfast
  • The average price of a cup of coffee in the US is $3.28
  • Coffee shops see a 7% annual growth rate on average
  • The annual coffee retail sales in the US are about $5.2 billion

In China, first we can find a subset of the 1.4 population by taking the ~60% between age 15-45 and ~60% in urban areas -> 500 million.

Then assuming 20% of the target 500 million customers will visit/purchase in stores like Luckin (-> 100 million) twice a week (100 cups per year) -> 10 billion cups per year.

The current average monthly transacting customers is 9 million.

Using average price of $2 per cup, the estimated market can reach $20 billion easily in 1-2 years.

And given that Luckin is expanding into other categories like cream cheese teas, fruit teas and juices, twice per week is not an overestimate.

An annualized revenue of $2 billion is only 10% of the addressable market.

Luckin Coffee (2)

Previous post on Luckin’s store counts growth.

As Luckin also reported the number of items sold, we could get the average net selling price, which is growing slowly. The discounts on items sold have already been considered in net revenue. (Free items are included in Sales & Marketing expenses).

Given that the menu prices are usually between RMB 21-27, the overall discount is still over 50%.

Another chart tho, is net product revenue per store. The number of store is averaged between the beginning and the end of the quarter. Since more stores are maturing, this figure is growing significantly.

In comparison, Starbucks International has a little bit less than $1 million per store, KFC China has a little bit over $250k per store.

  • Starbucks International company-operated per stores revenue $~0.9 million
    counts as of CY2019Q3: 5,860
    revenue as of CY2019Q3: $5,256.2 million
  • KFC China company-operated per stores revenue $~0.27 million
    counts as of CY2019Q3: 4,925+863 = 5,788
    revenue as of CY2019Q3: $1,546 million

An Update On Cannabis Market

One year after the legalization of recreational use of cannabis in Canada, and following up on the previous discussion of those public companies gathering partners/supports, ramping up production and declines in ASP, here is an another snapshot as of 2019 Q3.

The number of kilograms sold is soaring.

But ASP keep falling.

And here is the graph for aggregated market cap of cannabis companies as of 11/15.

 

Growing Number Of Paying Users On China’s Streaming Platforms

Paying to become a member of a video platform has gradually become mainstream in China, at least for the younger generations.

Consumer behaviors have been changing from searching for free sources (as there are fewer of them now than before) to paying for high quality and hassle-free subscriptions.

The leading platforms, iQiYi and Tencent Videos, have paying members exceeding 100 million in 2019 Q2 and 2019 Q3 respectively. The paying percentage is around 20% for a 500 million MAU (iQiYi 2018 Q4 MAU 454.5 million).

Alibaba’s Youku is only little behind (numbers are not disclosed).

Similar trends are found in Tencent Music and NetEase Music. While paying percentage is ~4-5%, it is picking up. Tencent Music’s online music paying users grew 42.2% yoy to 35.4 million (5.36% of 661 million MAU).

Emerging platforms like Bilibili are also seeing more paying users percentage.

DTC Brands Stocks Revealed Their Margins

As Direct-to-Consumer (DTC) businesses are booming and going public as companies, their earnings report gave us some insights into their gross margins and what those products cost the companies to produce (cost of goods sold is the flip side of gross margin).

Canada Goose, in their Second Quarter Fiscal 2019 results, said that DTC gross margin is 75.6%, a 40 bps increase from last year.

Image result for canada goose logo cost of goods sold: 24.4%

Moncler similarly has a gross margin of 76.6% for 2019 H1.

Image result for moncler logo cost of goods sold: 23.4%

Tiffany in the most recent quarter has a gross margin of 62.7%, decreasing from 64% the year before. LVMH recent announced its attempt to acquire Tiffany.

Image result for tiffany logo cost of goods sold: 37.3%

Even the giant consumer staples company Procter & Gamble’s gross margin stays at 47.7%.

Image result for p&g logo cost of goods sold: 52.3%

Meituan: Fighting Every War

The current Meituan (MeituanDianping) came from a merger between Meituan and Dianping in December 2015.

Once a company invested by Alibaba, Meituan has become more closer with Tencent after the merger.

At the beginning of 2016, MeituanDianping raised $3.3 billion from Tencent, DST Global and Temasek at a $15 billion pre-money valuation; meanwhile, Alibaba sold its stake for ~$900 million in the same month.

Later that year, in April 2016, Alibaba invested the $900 million in Ele.me and Ant Financial invested $350 million.

The war has already changed from Yelp and Groupon to more comprehensive areas – restaurants and other local services.

[Note – in 2014, Priceline (now Booking.com) agreed to buy restaurant booking service OpenTable for about $2.6 billion in cash. But in China, dining is not exactly scheduled by time but by getting a number into the line, determined by how many people are ahead of you.]

However, US and China are similar in the world of food delivery. Meituan and Ele.me are fighting in China while Uber Eats, DoorDash, GrubHub, PostMates are fighting in the US. The difference – China uses e-bikes and US uses cars.

And for other services like movies, Meituan spun-off Maoyan in 2016. Maoyan is competing with Tao Piaopiao, which raised ¥1.7 billion in 2016.

In the US, the market is led by Fandango and Atom Tickets. But the market is not limited to movies – it’s about all kinds of shows, concerts and exhibitions.

Meituan is also offering hotel & travel bookings, fighting in the war with Ctrip.

Going back to Meituan, it raised $4 billion in October 2017 from Tencent, Sequoia, GIC and Tiger Global.

Meituan Dianping introduced its ride-hailing operation Meituan Dache in February 2018.

In April 2018, Alibaba acquired Ele.me for $9.5 billion.

Same week , Meituan acquired mobike for $2.7 billion.

Later that month, Ant Financials led a round of $700 million for Hellobike.

Meituan went for IPO in Hong Kong in September 2018, raising $4.2 billion.

Another OTA, Tongcheng-Elong, with Tencent and Ctrip as major shareholders, went IPO in Hong Kong in November 2018, raising $180 million.


Summing up the wars Meituan is in:

  • Food delivery: with Alibaba’s Ele.me; same-day delivery: Dada-JD Daojia
  • Movie tickets: with Alibaba’s Tao Piaopiao
  • Ride-hailing: with Didi
  • Bike-sharing: with Hellobike and Didi Bike (Qingju)
  • Hotel and travel booking: with Ctrip
  • Payment & wallet

Consumers Now Can Choose 5G Plans in China (2)

In the last post, we look at the city coverage by three carriers.

Here is another comparison of the plans they provide, in terms of price and data.

Before looking at the table, another data point is useful – in September 2019, an average user consumed 8.39GB in data, up ~60% from 5.14GB September 2018, which grew ~2.6x from ~2GB in September 2017.

China Mobile’s plan has two version Personal & Family (the latter includes fixed broadband services).

There is not much difference between carriers, except that –

  • China Unicom & China Telecom trying to make a sales at 40GB level with China Unicom being more aggressive.
  • Consumers can experience higher speed with a smaller data plan for China Unicom & China Telecom
  • Initial discount availability is a little different; all provide discounts between 20-30% for the first 6 month
  • Additional data usage (outside of the plan) is priced at ¥3/GB, with first 3GB priced at ¥5/GB for China Mobile
Data Plan (GB) China Mobile China Unicom China Telecom avg. costs per GB Speed
30 128 129 129 4.3
500 Mbps
40 159 169 4.1
60 198 199 199 3.3
80 239 239 3.0
1 Gbps
100 298 299 299 3.0
150 398 399 399 2.7
300 598 599 599 2.0