How Do E-commerces Generate Revenue? (1) – Alibaba

So, Alibaba is now a diversified tech/internet company that not only has the biggest e-commerce presence in China, but also leads the cloud computing commercialization there.

Alibaba separates its business into four categories:

    • Core commerce
    • Cloud computing
    • Digital media and entertainment
    • Innovation initiatives and others

And “Core commerce” could further be divided based on China/International, retail/wholesale, logistics and others.

      • China commerce retail
      • China commerce wholesale
      • International commerce retail
      • International commerce wholesale
      • Cainiao logistics services
      • Others

“China commerce retail” is where most of the Taobao and Tmall’s numbers are presented – $36.9 billion, two-thirds of Alibaba’s total revenue in fiscal year 2019 (ended on March 31, 2019).

The revenue is supported by the huge GMVs of these two platforms.

  • Taobao GMV (billions, RMB, fiscal 16, 17, 18, 19) – 1,877 | 2,202 | 2,689 | 3,115
  • Tmall GMV (billions, RMB, fiscal 16, 17, 18, 19) – 1,215 | 1,565 | 2,131 | 2,612

A behemoth with a combined ¥5.7 trillion GMV (or more than $800 billion).

And here is its famous Singles’ Day GMV number in 2018 – $30.8 billion on a single day.

Source: notebookcheck.com

In comparison, Amazon had a GMV of nearly $300 billion in 2018 (not officially released number, but calculated).

Amazon GMV in 2018 = 10 * Alibaba’s 2018 Singles’ Day GMV

But what is Alibaba doing with all these merchandises transacted on its platform?

The “China commerce retail” category will be the main focus of here.


To start with, here is a description of Taobao from Alibaba’s 20-F for FY18.

Consumers come to Taobao Marketplace to enjoy an engaging, personalized shopping experience, optimized by our big data analytics. Through highly relevant and engaging content and real-time updates from merchants, consumers can learn about products and new trends. They can also interact with each other and their favorite merchants and brands. With a broad offering of interactive features such as live broadcast, groups and short videos, Taobao Marketplace has become an established social commerce platform.

Taobao Marketplace is also the entry point to verticals, such as second-hand auctions, and online travel booking, which may also be accessed through their own independent mobile apps.

Merchants on Taobao Marketplace are primarily individuals and small businesses. Merchants can create storefronts and listings on Taobao Marketplace free of charge. The escrow payment services provided by Alipay are free of charge to consumers and merchants unless payment is funded through a credit product such as a credit card, in which case Alipay charges a fee to the merchant based on the related bank fees charged to Alipay. Taobao Marketplace merchants can purchase P4P and display marketing services to direct traffic to their storefronts. In addition, merchants can acquire additional traffic from third-party marketing affiliates. Taobao Marketplace merchants can also pay for advanced storefront software that helps to upgrade, decorate and manage their online storefronts.

The revenue model of our China commerce retail business is primarily performance-based and is typically set by market-based bidding systems. Revenue from this model consists primarily of customer management revenue, commissions and other revenue.

Monetization Methods

  1. Customer management. (and I will call it ads or marketing services)

Alibaba says a substantial majority of our China commerce retail revenue from customer management, which primarily consists of:

        • P4P marketing services , where merchants primarily bid for keywords through our online auction system that match product or service listings appearing in search or browser results on a cost-per-click, or CPC, basis. Whether and where the listing will be displayed, and the corresponding prices for such display are determined by the algorithm of Alibaba’s online auction system based on a number of factors with various weights and through a market-based bidding mechanism.
        • Display marketing services , where merchants bid for display positions at fixed prices or prices established by a market-based bidding system on a cost-per-thousand impression, or CPM, basis.In addition to the above-mentioned P4P marketing services and display marketing services directly provided on our marketplaces, Alibaba also provides such services through collaboration with other third-party marketing affiliates. These third parties are primarily third-party online media, such as search engines, news feeds and video entertainment websites. These third-party online media enter into agreements with Alibaba to connect their designated online resources to our online auction system so that the merchants’ listings or other marketing information can be displayed on those third-party online media resources. Revenue from P4P and display marketing services provided through third-party marketing affiliates represented 3%, 3% and 2% of Alibaba’s total revenue in fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
        • Taobaoke program , where Alibaba collaborate with shopping guide platforms, medium- and small-sized websites, individuals and other third parties, collectively “Taobaokes,” to offer marketing services. Taobaokes display the marketing information of merchants on their media which facilitate our merchants to market and transact. Merchants pay commissions to such Taobaokes based on a percentage of transaction value generated from users under the Taobaoke program. Commissions on Taobaoke are set by the merchants. Revenue from the Taobaoke program represented 3%, 3% and 3% of Alibaba’s total revenue in fiscal years 2016, 2017 and 2018, respectively.
  1. Commissions on transactions. In addition to purchasing customer management services, merchants also pay a commission based on a percentage of transaction value generated on Tmall and certain other marketplaces. The commission percentages typically range from 0.3% to 5.0% depending on the product category.Commission revenue increased by 37% from RMB34,066 million in fiscal year 2017 to RMB46,525 million (US$7,417 million) in fiscal year 2018, primarily due to the strong growth in physical goods GMV on Tmall.
  2. Other. Other revenue from our China commerce retail is primarily generated by our New Retail business, mainly Intime, Tmall Imports and Hema, and primarily consists of revenue from product sales, commissions on transactions and software service fees.

Let’s do some calculation:

2018

    • revenue (customer management) – 114,285 million RMB
      • take rate: 2.3710% (of Taobao + Tmall GMV)
    • revenue (commission) – 46,525 million RMB
      • take rate: 2.1832% (of Tmall GMV)

2019

    • revenue (customer management) – 145,684 million RMB
      • take rate: 2.5438% (of Taobao + Tmall GMV)
    • revenue (commission) – 61,847 million RMB
      • take rate: 2.3678% (of Tmall GMV)

The higher take rates are generally good – it shows Alibaba’s market power and the value of its platform.

However, it also means selling on Alibaba’s platforms is becoming more expensive.

Meanwhile, it’s worth noting that when people use e-commerce to do searches, it’s not good to search engines like Baidu.

It is the same across China and US, where Amazon is growing its ads revenue in a market Google and Facebook dominate.

Actually, the value of Alibaba blocking Baidu’s search on Taobao pages in 2008 is a hundreds-of-billion-dollar action. (this didn’t happen in the US)

Diversification From Smartphones: Services For Apple, IoTs For Xiaomi

It has been a well-known fact that the global smartphone market is maturing and the shipment volume has found its turn.

The decline is real and accelerating.

 …first quarter of 2019 (1Q19) with shipment volumes down 6.6% year over year…

Smartphone vendors shipped a total of 310.8 million units in 1Q19, which marked the sixth consecutive quarter of decline. In 2018, smartphone shipments dropped 4.1% over 2017, which was inclusive of a first quarter that was down 3.5% – just half of what the market experienced in 1Q19.

International Data Corporation (IDC) April 30, 2019

Image result for global smartphone shipment


While top performers are still trying to grab market shares (some go for higher ASP targeting market shares in terms of revenue; others go for value targeting market shares in terms of shipments), they have designed their way to grow upon/out of smartphones.

Apple will go for services. [Read more from a previous post]

Meanwhile, Xiaomi, long being tagged as “the Apple of China”, is aiming the IoTs.

I would like to say the IoT focus is making Xiaomi more unique than its phone business.

As of March 2018, we (Xiaomi) had over 100 million connected devices (excluding smartphones and laptops)

…the largest consumer IoT platform globally according to iResearch

Xiaomi Corporation prospectus

And the segment grows fast in throughout 2018, and still maintained 56.5% growth rate in 2019 Q1.

Source: Xiaomi filings

Some of its items have risen fast into the go-to choice in those categories, such as Mi Air Purifier, Mi Band, etc.

Source: venturebeat.com

In November 2018, Xiaomi announced a strategic partnership with IKEA. IKEA’s full range of smart lighting products will be connected to Xiaomi’s IoT platform starting this December in China.

In January 2019, Xiaomi announced taking a 0.48% stake in TV manufacturer TCL, deepening an existing alliance that saw the two work together to integrate Xiaomi’s operating system into TCL products. [Techcrunch]

Another number – MIUI MAU is constantly adding ~17-19 million each quarter.

17Q1 17Q2 17Q3 17Q4 18Q1 18Q2 18Q3 18Q4 19Q1
MIUI MAU (millions) 138.3 146.0 156.5 170.8 190.0 206.9 224.4 242.1 260.9
incremental (millions) 7.7 10.5 14.3 19.2 16.9 17.5 17.7 18.8

Overall speaking, I think the IoT revenue should be around 30% for 2019 and may stay between 35-40% in the future.


At the same time, geographically speaking, Xiaomi is one of those companies that are benefitted the most from India’s growth.

A Roundup of Recent E-commerce IPOs

From Mogujie (NYSE: MOGU) to Ruhan (NASDAQ: RUHN) to Yunji (NASDAQ: YJ), a series of second-tier (in terms of size at least) Chinese e-commerce companies has filed with SEC and raised $66.5 million, $125 million, $121 million respectively (excluding any over-allotment option).

The interests were stirred by (at least) the capital market success of Pinduoduo.

In its IPO, Pinduoduo was valued at $23.8 billion including all outstanding share options, compared with a valuation of $15 billion following a funding round in April, 2018. (Reuters)

users comparison at PDD’s IPO vs. Taobao, JD | Source: Bloomberg, Jiguang

Following the IPO in July last year, Pinduoduo raised another $1,375 million in February at $25 per ADS (IPO priced at $19 for ~$1.6 billion).


However, it seems that only Pinduoduo could maintain a high valuation.

Partially due to a bad timing, Mogu, valued at $3 billion in 2016 and seeking a valuation of $4 billion in early 2018, reduced its target and was priced at the lower end for $1.3 billion. The previous valuation was derived from a merger tho.

Mogu Inc. ended its New York debut at the same price as its initial public offering $14, after dipping as much as 15% during the day. [Caixing]

As of May 17, 2019, Mogu closed at $5.4 per ADS, down more than 61% from the IPO price of $14.

Ruhan, or Ruhhn, slipped 37% below its IPO price on the first day of trading following a $125 million NASDAQ offering. [AVCJ]

As of May 17, 2019, it closed at $4.25 per ADS, down more than 66% from the IPO price of $12.5.

Yunji, debuted this month, has maintained $0.01 above its IPO price of $11 as of May 17, 2019. Yunji’s valuation is more supported by its revenue (EV/revenue multiple is close to 1).


And a roundup of multiples at IPO, using an exchange ratio of 6.8

EV/GMV EV/Revenue
PDD 0.28 10.19
MOGU 0.43 7.06
RUHN 2.34 5.72
YJ 0.56 0.98

 

Coffee Chains And Prices In China

While Starbucks is probably the No.1 coffee brand in China, its position has constantly been challenged. Luckin Coffee, (briefly covered in a previous post) is cutting into the mass market with lower pricing.

Many people are eyeing on China’s growing coffee market, which will be huge and many are betting on the growth in average coffee consumption.

On the global capital market, Starbucks’ China push and Blue Bottle’s exciting/interesting movements (Jun 2015 $70 million series C; Sep 2017 acquired by Nestle, $425 million for ~68%) may as well push Chinese counter-parties to think about aggressive expansion or building boutique brands.

Listed here are 3 shops I visited recently. Will add more during the summer.

Costa, from UK

Costa Coffee is eyeing 1,200 stores in China by 2022, a big increase from more than 400 at the end of 2017.

Costa stores | Source: Business Insider

Costa is in direct competition with Starbucks, pricing its coffee at exactly the same level – grande latte @ ¥32.

% arabica, from Japan

% arabica @ the bund, Shanghai | Source: arabica.coffee

Started in 2014 in Kyoto, Japan, % arabica is a young brand. It opened the first store in China in Shanghai in Feb 2018 in a trendy (网红) way. It already has opened 4 store in Shanghai alone, including a roastery at the Bund (7 in mainland China and 4 in Hong Kong as of May 2019).

% arabica is a premium brand with latte price starting @ ¥35 (but in short size), @ ¥45 for a tall size (or a little bigger than tall.. cant’ tell exactly), @ ¥40 for tall ice latte.

S.Engine, from Shanghai

A trendy (网红) brand, 鹰集 is a little pricer than Starbucks, with its flagship store opened in January 2017 at Xintiandi, Shanghai.

While its office website only lists 3 locations right now, its has 6 places listed on Meituan in Shanghai. Growing very fast.

S.Engine on Meituan | Source: meituan.com

Pricing is in line with (or a little lower than) boutique coffee shops. Americano @ ¥28 and latte @ ¥36 (¥38 for ice latte). There is only one size (tall); a fair amount of cups are served in reusable cups.

NIO Feeling Similar Pain As Tesla – Lack of Demand

When Tesla said “Deliveries were approximately 63,000 vehicles, which was 110% more than the same quarter last year, but 31% less than last quarter”, NIO wanted to say something similar.

The 2019 Q1 deliveries number was approximately half of that in 2018 Q4. (Still a good job in ramping up production fast)

To compare in numbers:

    • Tesla deliveries is ~15.8x NIO’s in 2019 Q1, ~11.4x  in 2018 Q4
    • Tesla’s automotive revenue in 2018 Q4 was $6.3 billion vs. NIO $0.5 billion:  ~12.6x
    • Current valuation 8x ($40bn vs. $5bn)

NIO said ES6 (to start deliveries in June) should have more than 10,000 pre-orders before deliveries.

An Update on Tesla

In the previous post on Tesla’s productions & deliveries (2018 Q4), a not-so-good Q1 is somehow foreseeable, when Model 3 has little QoQ growth from Q3 to Q4 despite the holiday season and a fade in US tax credit at year-end.

Tesla has more concerning issues.

Depressed Margins

The mass production of Model 3 in 2018 H2 helped to improve the automotive sales gross margin in Q3 and Q4.

However, due to the price reduction in 2019 Q1, less absorption of fixed cost and more international deliveries, the automotive sales gross margin went back to the 18-19% region in 2019 Q1.

While production in China is expected to reach a rate of 2,000 vehicles a week by the end of 2019 (according to Elon Musk), the gross margin of automotive sales will remain <20% for 2019 I think (with model 3 basic)

Tesla said the capital spend (CapEx) per unit of capacity for Shanghai factory is expected to be less than half of that of the Model 3 line in Fremont. Not 50% COGS though.

Model S & X Halved

Number of produced is at ~56% of 2018 Q4.

Number of delivered is at ~44% of 2018 Q4.

Though, Tesla reaffirmed its prior guidance of 360,000 to 400,000 vehicle deliveries in 2019, thanks to the confidence in Model 3.

China Sales

Although China (China and Europe mainly) sales in 2018 decreased compared to 2017, Tesla’s March performance in China is exceptional, with 9,273 in total (Model 3: 7515; Model X: 1490; Model S: 268)

Tesla Vehicles Sold in China 2019 Q1 | Source: Che Jing She, sohu.com

Many attributed the jump in sales to the “one time” price adjustment in China, including a ¥341 drop in the most expansive Model X (P100D), which then corrected by a general 3% increase.

Source: sohu.com

But the ongoing sales numbers is still in question.

China’s EV market has been increasingly competitive. And in April, a video of a parked Model S emitting smoke and bursting into flames seconds later was spreading across China’s Weibo, which doesn’t do any help.

 

Coffee Chains in China

In a previous post about Starbucks, we talked about its potential in China.

China’s coffee consumption will explode, even considering major cities alone. Younger generations will consume more coffee and they will represent an increasing proportion of the overall urban population.

China coffee consumption potential | Source: Starbucks 6/19 Presentation

Everyone sees the market and opportunities – one of the most eye-catching player is Luckin Coffee (瑞幸咖啡), who just filed to be listed on Nasdaq.

Image result for Luckin Coffee
Source: TechCrunch

The expansion in terms of coverage & number of stores is very impressive: 9 stores by the end of 2017 and 2,370 stores by the end of 2019Q1, although most (91.3 %) of them are pick-up stores (see above).

By comparison, in May 2018, Starbucks announced that it is planning to build nearly 3,000 new stores in mainland China over the next few years (from 3,300 in 2018Q1 to 6,000 before the end of 2022).

Things to notice:

    • Luckin Coffee outsourced delivery services mainly to S.F. Express (顺丰控股SHE: 002352)
    • Luckin’s investors are mainly related to UCAR INC. (神州优车 NEEQ:838006)
    • Didn’t see GIC or BlackRock or Legend Capital as major shareholders (>5%)
    • Loss is significant: ¥527 million operation loss on ¥361 million revenue in 2019Q1 (-110.1%)
    • No significant revenue growth from 2018Q4 to 2019Q1: 465,433k to 478,510k (+2.8%)
    • There was a decrease in advertising cost: 127,372 in 2018Q4 -> 93,080 in 2018Q4 -> 40,143 in 2019Q1

Disney+ Is Coming

When all the fellow streaming platforms are adding their original content capacities, on April 11, the biggest original content provider Disney Group finalized the pricing ($6.99/month) of its own streaming platform, Disney+. And the official US launch date is later this year on November 12.

Disney+ pricing | Source: Disney investor day presentation

Disney’s preparation and acquisition of BAMTech

Disney’s plan to launch its own streaming service has been around for quite some time. Its first official announcement was in August 2017 with Disney’s acquisition of an additional 42% of BAMTech for $1.58 billion, which gave Disney a controlling stake of 75%.

Source: disney.fandom.com

Before that, in August 2016, Disney acquired 33% of BAMTech (a spin-off from MLB’s broader digital business, MLB Advanced Media) for $1 billion.

BAMTech is the streaming technology provider for services including HBO NOW (launched in March 2015 with Apple being the exclusive launch partner; and Apple was promoting its Apple TV), National Hockey League (NHL), Major League Baseball (MLB), etc.

Disney Chairman and Chief Executive Officer Bob Iger talked about the streaming service on the BAML conference in September 2017.

What we’re going to do with the Disney direct-to-consumer app or platform is, first of all, we’re going to launch it in late 2019. We’re doing that for 2 reasons. First of all, as we exit the Netflix output deal, we don’t get access to our theatrical release movies until the beginning of ’19. Secondly, we wanted time to actually develop and build up original programming for the platform.

Following the 2016 transaction, Disney made plans to test BAMTech’s delivery and support of streaming video and other digital products from Disney|ABC Television Group and ESPN.

ESPN+ as a test-out

Following the 2017 transaction, Disney said it would launch its ESPN-branded multi-sport video streaming service in early 2018.

The new ESPN app and the ESPN+ service were launched in April 2018, provided by BAMTech. ESPN+ is priced at $4.99 a month or $49.99 a year.

What is different though, is that the content on ESPN+ is not a replacement of cable subscriptions (at least for now). ESPN Plus will not provide live access to ESPN’s main channels like ESPN and ESPN2 – you’ll still need a cable subscription to authenticate and watch. [TechCrunch]

new ESPN app and ESPN+ | Source: theverge.com

After all, ESPN is originally a cable business and sports are heavily rely on ads. ESPN+ is an ad-embedded streaming service (video ads).

In 10 month, the number of ESPN+ subscribers has reached 2 million.

On the other hand, ESPN itself (cable) lost 2 million subscribers in fiscal year 2018, with total subscribers of 86 million as of September 2018.

ESPN+ is expected to have 8-12 million subscribers by the end of FY 2024.

So Disney+ and its expectation

It will be one of (the most important one) the three pillars of Disney’s streaming services, alongside with ESPN+ and Hulu (will discuss separately).

Source: nscreenmedia.com

Its direct competitors are Netflix and HBO Now. Bob Iger has specifically said it would be priced lower than Netflix years ago.

Priced at $6.99 a month or $69.99 per year, Disney+ is $2 lower than Netflix’ new basic monthly plan. Netflix announced the new pricing for United States in January 2019 to replace it original $7.99/10.99/13.99 lineup, effective May 2019.

Netflix new pricing 2019 | Source: netflix.com

The contents are powerful, including Disney, Pixar, Marvel, Star Wars, and National Geographic, etc.

Disney+ contents | Source: variety.com & Bob Iger Twitter

It is targeting 60-90 million subscribers in five years, by the end of FY 2024 (September 2014) and 1/3 would be in the US.

Meanwhile, the Disney Channel has seen its subscribers ebb to 89 million, down from 92 million in fiscal 2017. [Variety]

And Netflix now has 148.8 million subscribers globally, 60.2 million from the US, as of 2019 Q1.

 

 

Zoom, How Not To Underestimate Its Usefulness And Influence

Zoom went on Nasdaq with the IPO price of $36 (target range of $33 to $35 per share), opened at ~$65 and closed at $62 (up 72%), making it in par with Lyft.

Several things to note here:

    • Zoom is relatively young. It maintained high growth (2018 revenue of $331 million, 2017 revenue of $151 million) and is expected to grow fast.
    • Zoom is making a net profit in 2018 (~2.3% profit margin) and has maintained a high gross margin (~80%).
Source: Zoom SEC Filing. Author
    • Growth in customers – “As of January 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, we had approximately 10,900, 25,800 and 50,800 customers with more than 10 employees.” they “represented 69%, 75% and 78% of revenue
    • Market Size – In the US, business with
      • 10-19 employees: 46,635
      • 20-49 employees: 37,495
      • 50-249 employees: 23,065
      • 250 or more: 5,672
      • ~113k in total, so Zoom has another 50% room to grow (will be harder and more costly)

    • market penetration and growth opportunity in large enterprise customers – “greater than 50% of the Fortune 500 had at least one paid Zoom host, compared to only 4% that contributed more than $100,000 of revenue. We believe this demonstrates that our product has already gained a foothold in many of the largest enterprises in the United States, and there is a large opportunity to expand within these large enterprise customers”
    • Revenue per large enterprise customer will grow, easily – “Some of our larger enterprise customers start with a single deployment of Zoom Meetings with one team, location or geography, before rolling out our platform throughout their organization.” “As of January 31, 2017, 2018 and 2019, we had 54, 143 and 344 customers that contributed more than $100,000 of revenue in each of their respective fiscal years”
    • Zoom’s future depends on its business outside video conferencing; it could grow into an essential infrastructure for business operations; it could do more than video conferencing, but also scheduling, internal messaging and other management tools.

Zoom, Slack, Alibaba’s Dingding (DingTalk), WeChat for Enterprise will meetup in the future, in the battle of office app/platform.


Read More on Zoom’s IPO

Inevitable Inflation: Yet Another Example From Starbucks Rewards

Having lived for 3 years, the current Starbucks Rewards program will end on April 15, 2019. The most direct comparison with the new program is the cost of “a free drink” – raised from 125 stars to 150 stars, a 20% inflation.

Starbucks Rewards April 2019 | Source: starbucks.com

Taking the previous revamp into account, from pre-April-2016 to post-April-2019, the program has been through 2 major changes with “points inflation” being the unchanged theme.

Let’s go back and do some calculation.

Program Redesign In April 2016

Starbucks Rewards has been through a redesign in April 2016, which transformed the transaction-based system into a value-based one.

Basically, before 2016, a $1.95 purchase is equivalent to a $5+ purchase in terms of stars earned (1 star; 12 starts = 1 free drink).

Starbucks Rewards revamp in April 2016 | Source: starbucks.com

Assuming a customer would use his/her stars for a free item with an average value of $5:

    • For a customer normally purchase an item of $2.5 to earn stars, the reward yield is approximately halved:
      • previously – 5/(12*2.5) = 16.67%
      • 2016 program – 5/(125/2/2.5*2.5) = 8%
    • For a customer normally purchase an item of $3.5 to earn stars, the reward yield is cut by 1/3:
      • previously – 5/(12*3.5) = 12%
      • 2016 program – 5/(125/2/3.5*3.5) = 8%

This change was resonating with a broader trend in “rewards” offered by consumer-facing industries such as airlines.

American Airlines is the latest major airlines that changed its rewards calculation from distance-based to money-based (announced in November 2015, effective August 2016)

United award miles redesign | Source: thepointsguy.com

Program Redesign In April 2019

As I mentioned at the beginning, the new program features a 20% inflation in terms of redeeming free drinks.

For dollar values, in the 2016-version, a Starbucks star is approximately worth 4 cents ($5/125); now, it is approximately 3.33 cents ($5/150). [to enhance the utility, one could order a venti drink and add a shot, making free drink ~$9 so a star is worth ~7 cents before and ~6 cents in the new program]

However, better yields could be found in hot coffee/tea.

    • hot tea usually has a price of $2.25/2.45/2.65 for tall/grande/venti size; simply taking it as a $2.5 value, a star = $2.5/50 = 5 cents
    • hot coffee (in brewed coffee category) usually has a price of $2.15/2.45/2.75 for tall/grande/venti size; in a venti size coffee, a star = $2.75/50 = 5.5 cents
      • there is a brewed product called Caffe Misto, which has a value of $3.35 for venti size, then a star = 6.67 cents
    • for lunch items, to make a star’s value above 4 cents, items needs to have a value of $8; and a $10 item for 5 cents value. Those items could be easily found in Starbucks’ new Mercato lunch category

The items above will maintain the value of stars and provide the valuable revenue diversification for Starbucks (especially for lunch items).

Plus, those items usually involve less manual work from baristas. They could enhance the overall productivity for Starbucks stores and increase the profit margin on average.