2022 GDP is revised down to 120.4724 trillion yuan vs. 121.0207 trillion yuan.
2023 GDP is expected to be north of 126 trillion yuan, so that’s 4.6% yoy growth (or can be rounded to 5%). But it’s 4.1% growth using previous number.
2022 GDP is revised down to 120.4724 trillion yuan vs. 121.0207 trillion yuan.
2023 GDP is expected to be north of 126 trillion yuan, so that’s 4.6% yoy growth (or can be rounded to 5%). But it’s 4.1% growth using previous number.
After a 20-year [1982 to 2002] journey, Nikkei 250 index was back to the starting point.
And it hasn’t yet reached the previous high 34 years ago (1989 level) as of 2023.
What happened?
A lot of things to unpack.
GDP
I am looking at GDP (in local currency terms) first – equity market should be a ratio of GDP.
Japan already enjoyed a robust growth (1972-1982) with GDP almost tripped in 10 years (!), which translates to 11.4% cagr.
The miracle continued for another decade.
1991 GDP also grew 6.4% yoy vs. 1990; however, GDP growth dropped to 2.5% in 1992 and to 0.0% in 1993.
During the second phase of which ended on 1991, Japan’s GDP still compounded at ~6% cagr (1981 – 1991), although not as high as the last decade. And Nikkei index climbed during this period as well.
What’s wrong then?
The “10-year GDP cagr” would drop continuously from 1991’s 6% to below 1% in 2002.
Remember, Nikkei index peaked in 1989 (red mark).
While in 1990 and 1991 Japan’s GDP still enjoyed 7.6% and 6.4% growth, 1992 would be 2.5% and 1993 would be 0%.
It was the mid-term / 5-year projection that’s worrisome. And indeed, the 10-year GDP cagr would start to decay, with no reversal in sight.
Nikkei index bottomed in 2003, when the dot-com bubble also came to an end. S&P 500 dropped ~24% in 2002 (after double-digit drop in 2000 and 2001), but grew 26% in 2003.
The index bottomed as the 10-year GDP growth would be bottoming and things won’t go much worse from here.
Nikkei index is now (2023) ~4x the 2003 bottom though, what happened?
Nikkei index climbed 4 consecutive years (2003 – 2006), before the Global Financial Crisis hit.
Japan’s 10-year GDP cagr would still be ~0% in 2007, but from 2004 to 2007 it experienced a 4 consecutive year of GDP growth.
Things would look better in 2012, when Japan GDP would be re-entering a growth mode. 10-year GDP cagr would bottom in 2011 at -0.7% and recovered to 0.1% in 2015 and to 1.2% in 2019 before covid.
To make it a full graph.
As mentioned above, although 10-year GDP cagr still has pressure from 2003 onward, actually yearly GDP growth is positive from 2004-2007. Therefore the 3-5 year outlook would actually be reversing in 2003.
As a key revenue stream for NYC, real estate taxes for FY2023 (ended June 2023) totaled $31,645mn, or near 30% of total revenue.
Shanghai in 2022 had 23.711 bn rmb property tax (房产税), or ~$3.4bn in USD, or ~11% of NYC.
Recovery Tracker
after China reopened in 2023, flights were set to increase from 16 per week to 24 per week, announced in March 2023.
In Aug 2023, two sides agreed to double capacity of 48 per week, ramping up to 36 per week on Sep 1, and 48 per week on Oct 29.
Flights would further increase to 70 per week starting Nov. 9.
Technical difficulties
US need to avoid Russian airspace, which requires longer distance and thus refueling.
Impact on tourism
e.g. SF: visitors from Mainland would be only ~20% of 2019 level.
“In 2019, 518,000 of San Francisco’s 4.3 million international visitors were from China, according to data provided by SF Travel. Though visitors from Mexico outnumbered them by about 100,000, visitors from China spent the most of any group, accounting for $1.2 billion of the $7.7 billion international tourists spent in the city that year.
This year, visitors from China are expected to number only one-fifth of their 2019 total, and expected to spend just under $450 million. That brings the city’s total international visitor spending down from 2019’s $7.7 billion to an expected $5.9 billion in 2023.”
— SF Chronicle (https://www.sfchronicle.com/sf/article/international-tourism-china-recovery-18188305.php)
Other sources:
https://www.regulations.gov/document/DOT-OST-2020-0052-0165
Looks like the monthly sales is still health. Month to clear inventory is steady and up a bit to ~7.8 months in Oct 2023.
Currently monthly sales pace is better than 2018 and 2022, despite record high interest rate in recent years.
New homes for sales has gone up more. So the number month to clear new home inventory has gone up to 7-8 months recently vs. an average of 6.2 months in 2018. And is much better than the 2020-21 average of 5.1 months.
Better availability should be good for inflation and soft-landing scenario.
See the other post for China new home sales – the inventory stood at over 20 months the last time I checked.
A good summary from Rob Stuckey, head of Carlyle’s U.S. real estate funds, on US office building weakness, from Insights and Indicators podcast by Carlyle:
Factors to value real estate
Back to 2021-2022, Meituan’s quarterly results experienced various changes in reported metrics, which looks a bit dubious and problematic – whether it’s due to conflicts when measuring performance internally and to investors, or gov’s implicit requirement, or regulation changes.
Here are the 4 changes:
1/ Food delivery revenue split (2021q4): “Commission” split into “Commission” and “Food delivery services”, not segment changes.
2021q3
2021q4
2/ no more “GTV of food delivery” and “number of domestic hotel room nights” (2022q1)
2021q4
2022q1
3/ big change in 2022q2: new segment reporting of “Core local
commerce”, which combines previous “Food delivery”, “In-store, hotel & travel” & some business previously in “New initiatives and others”, e.g. Meituan Instashopping (美團閃購)
2022q1
2022q2
This segment reporting is used as of today.
Plus, in operating metrics, “Number of food delivery transactions” is now “Number of On-demand Delivery transactions”.
2022q1
2022q2
This is interesting – according to the footnote, “Number of On-demand Delivery transactions” includes number of transactions from food delivery and Meituan Instashopping businesses. While it’s consistent with “Core local commerce” definition, it’s hard to argue why business like Meituan Grocery (美團買
菜), which is under “New initiatives and others”, is not on-demand delivery transaction.
Plus, since “Core local commerce” now includes in-store, hotels etc., which has nothing to do with “delivery”, it’s hard to know the unit economics for delivery.
4/ No more reporting of “Number of Transacting Users”, “Number of Active Merchants” and transaction per user (2023q1)
2022q4
Gone in 2023q1
Biotech
Nov – Modern Shanghai plant break ground; the $1bn deal was signed in July
Oct – Junshi’s PD-1 drug, with US & Canada right purchased by partner Coherus was approved by FDA
Agricultural purchases
Oct – signed 11 purchasing agreements/contracts, worth multiple billions in value
Nov – 600k ton soybeans; and then 3mn+ tons; a good summary here
Cargill Inc., the world’s biggest #crop trader, said #China just made an enormous purchase of US #soybeans (more than 3 million metric tons) that underscores bullish momentum in the global #oilseed #market.https://t.co/dOa0sFaAAT
— farmdoc daily (@farmdocDaily) November 11, 2023
Industrial / Areospace
Nov – GE Aerospace’s 25 GEnx-1B engines order from China Eastern Airlines to power its Boeing 787 fleet.
Nov – Xiamen Airlines purchases.
Market is speculating more Boeing orders.
Consumer internet / tech
Nov – Meta’s Oculus is coming to China in late 2024 (w/ a lower-end version of Quest 3), with Tencent as partner; WSJ reported the talk between Meta and Tencent back in Feb 2023.
Nov – Nvidia to release 3 new chips for China market (H20, L20 and L2), available as soon as the end of this year.
Facts for China new home sales
2020 | 2023 | ||
Sep | Sep | ||
‘0000 sqm | 万,平方米 | ||
Supply | 供应面积 | 7,529 | 2,990 |
Demand | 成交面积 | 5,228 | 2,262 |
Inventory | 库存 | 50,739 | 51,221 |
Sales pace (month) | 9.71 | 22.64 |
Inventory actually didn’t increase much, flat after 3 three years.
But the willingness to purchase (new homes) has decreased, area sold in Sep 2023 is less than half (43%) of 2020 Sep level.
Therefore, the resulting month-to-clear-for-sale-homes is more than doubled from ~10 month to almost 23 month – it will need almost 2 years to clear new house inventory at current sales pace.
The above figure is for 100 cities in China.
To look at the bottom 10 cities: back in Sep 2020, the worst 10 cities needed 21.5 – 35.3 month to clear inventory whereas in Sep 2023, the worst 10 cities will need 57.6 – 93.9 month to clear inventory.
Source:
http://m.fangchan.com/news/320/2023-10-25/7122778841134993672.html
http://news.dichan.sina.com.cn/2020/10/27/1274844.html
You can get 20% return on stocks per year if you are as good as Buffet.
But books and reading have a much higher return!
The cost of a book is basically cost-plus, including those paid to the author. It’s relatively small sum of money – likely less than a meal.
The price is similar for every one. It’s up to each reader to capture all the upside to him/herself. No price discrimination.
The paper and the printing are basically similar across books – different words on a single page don’t mean they cost differently. Therefore, an amazing book costs the same as any other books (well, royalties, length, quality of paper may differ, but you know what I mean).
Put it another way, a good reader can get higher value from reading books, without increasing costs, if he/she can pick “high value” books (for him/herself).
It’s like Nvidia pays similar prices as others for the same wafer to TSMC, but gets higher value/return from it.
Besides money, readers are also investing their time. So, the return of reading a book could be even higher if he/she can read more efficiently, reducing time spent while still get most of the stuff.
It’s like fitting a few more chips onto one wafer.
What’s more impressive? TSMC has a high market share and some bargain power, but printing books seem to be very fragmented and has very good availability.
Enjoy reading great books! That’s likely a higher return investment than Nvidia selling chips.