Series A-1: How biotech companies in China are funded?

 

  1. VC/PE funding

 

VC/PE funds targeting China life science investments are growing fast in recent years. According to ChinaBio, in 2018 those VC/PE funds raised around $43 billion in total and invested  around $17 billion in China life science companies, up 36% from 2017[1],.

 

The amount raised by VC/PE funds quickly ramped up during the past several years, with $10.9 billion in 2015, $20.2 billion in 2016, $39.8 billion in 2017[2].

 

Accordingly, the capital invested soared from $1-1.8 billion annually (2012-2015) to $5.4 billion in 2016, $11.7 billion in 2017 and $17.3 billion in 20182.

 

 

[One thing worth noting – many Chinese life sciences companies included/collected in ChinaBio’ research are not purely biotechnology/biopharma companies. For some VC/PE funds, for the purpose of diversification or due to other reasons, they might invest in areas other than biotechnologies.]

 

  1. IPO and capital markets

 

Similar to more developed countries like US, IPO is the most common choice for biotech companies and the funds behind them. [Another common exit opportunity is M&A, which is less likely for Chines biotech companies due to the less matured industry and capital market]

 

However, historically China’s own capital markets won’t accept most biotech companies because they are in their R&D stage with no products. Listing on China’s A-share has many requirements including reaching certain revenue and profit targets, which is very different from listing on NASDAQ. The lack of exit opportunities also (partially) explains the lack of funding in previous years. With the rise of VC/PE investments in Chinese biotech companies, appropriate exit options are needed/expected.

 

Starting from April 30 2018, Hong Kong Stock Exchange got a much anticipated listing pathway official for pre-revenue biotech companies[3],[4].

 

Five Chinese biotech companies went on HKSE via the new rule in 2018, raising nearly US$2.4 billion – Ascletis Pharma $400 million, BeiGene $903 million, Hua Medicine $114 million, Innovent $485 million, Shanghai Junshi $453 million[5],[6].

 

[The first few biotech companies listed on HKSE using the new rule are those large and “first-tier” startups; I will expect smaller IPOs in the coming years]

 

Another new board “Kechuang”, or tech board by Shanghai Stock Exchange is also going to welcome pre-revenue biotech companies starting in 2019[7]. No such listing has happened yet.

 

The capital market in China for biotech companies is still at an early stage. IPO is only one of the techniques. For example, while Nasdaq-listed biotech firms have raised US$3.5 billion from 32 post-IPO “follow-on” share issuances in the period, none has been recorded in Hong Kong yet[8].

 

  1. Public sector / state funding

 

  • Overall scale

Direct funding sources to innovations in life sciences and biotechnologies from Chinese government was said to be over ¥60 billion over the last 5 years, according to Yuanbin Wu, an officer at China’s Minister of Science and Technology, on a conference in October 2018[9].

 

Another research article published on NEJM in 2014 said China’s public sector R&D expenditure in biomedical was $2 billion in 2012[10].

 

  • Structure

A 2011 paper discussed the structure of state sponsored biotech R&D at that time[11].

NSFC = The National Natural Science Foundation of China 国家自然科学基金委员会

MOST = The Ministry of Science and Technology of the People’s Republic of China

 

There were some consolidations happening, especially for programs within MOST, which are now under one umbrella – National Key R&D Program of China (国家重点研发计划)[12].

 

And in 2018, China planned to merge NSFC under MOST[13].

 

  • NSFC

Direct supporting from NSFC totaled ~¥26 billion in 2018[14], including ¥11.2 billion available in its General Program (with ¥1.8 billion in life sciences and ¥2.5 billion in medical sciences)[15]. NSFC’s major programs are detailed below.

 

2018 National Natural Science Foundation of China (Jan 1, 2018 – Oct 24, 2018)

NSFC program names Total (all disciplines)

(¥, millions)

Life Sciences

(¥, millions)

Medical Sciences

(¥, millions)

General Program
面上项目
     11,152.89     1,774.7     2,521.20
Young Scientists Fund

青年科学基金项目

       4,176.44        582.40        886.80
Fund for Less Developed Regions

地区科学基金

       1,103.33        292.60        312.00
Key Program

重点项目

       2,054.42        323.00        352.70
National Science Fund for Distinguished Young Scholars杰出青年基金项目           682.85          87.50          84.00
Joint Research Fund for Overseas Chinese, Hong Kong and Macao Young Scholars海外及港澳学者合作研究基金项目             54.00            9.00            9.72
Excellent Young Scientists Fund

优秀青年基金项目

          520.00          75.40          65.00
Total      19,743.93     3,144.60     4,231.42

 

In terms of acceptance rate, for example, NSFC General Program accepted ~20% of projects across all disciplines in 2018 (specifically, life sciences 24% and medical sciences 17%). A history analysis of the fund’s overall acceptance and support is discussed in this article[16].

 

  • MOST

According to MOST’s 2018 budget, National Key R&D Program of China (国家重点研发计划) receives a budget of ~¥27.7 billion in 2018. Another program under MOST is National Science and Technology Major Project (国家科技重大专项), which receives a budget of ~43.8 million[17]. (both numbers are for all disciplines; allocation for biotech related projects is not available)

 

There are other forms of supports from both central and local governments for biotech companies in China, including tax-cut, low-cost infrastructure, etc.[18]

 

  1. Other corporate involvement

 

While China doesn’t have many big pharma companies that are financially strong, some giants in tech and insurance (Baidu, Tencent, Alibaba, PingAn, etc.) have provided certain funding to areas they are interested, usually involving digitalization, data or AI, such as genomics, diagnostics and telemedicine[19].

[1] http://www.chinabiotoday.com/articles/China-Life-Science-2018

[2] http://www.chinabiotoday.com/custom/ChinaBio_State_of_Life_Science_2019%20-%20Jan%202019%20-%20China%20Showcase%20-%20DIST(1)%20-%20Copy%201.pdf

[3] https://www.scmp.com/comment/insight-opinion/article/2143267/hkexs-new-listing-rules-will-bring-tech-economy-hong-kong

[4] https://www.hkex.com.hk/-/media/HKEX-Market/Listing/Rules-and-Guidance/Listing-Rules-Contingency/Main-Board-Listing-Rules/Equity-Securities/chapter_18a.pdf?la=en

[5] https://www.hkex.com.hk/-/media/HKEX-Market/Listing/Getting-Started/HKEX-Biotech-Newsletter-Issue-1.pdf

[6] https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/cn/Documents/finance/deloitte-cn-mna-medicine-and-biotechnology-industry-driven-by-innovative-drugs-zh-190412.pdf

[7] https://www.spglobal.com/marketintelligence/en/news-insights/trending/amoyKnMDGMXvpAJ-p0aiHA2

[8] https://www.scmp.com/business/investor-relations/ipo-quote-profile/article/3012766/shanghai-tech-board-unlikely

[9] http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-10/29/content_5335500.htm

[10] http://rwjcsp.unc.edu/downloads/news/2014/20140102_NEJM.pdf

[11] https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-00592303/document

[12] https://baike.baidu.com/item/%E5%9B%BD%E5%AE%B6%E9%87%8D%E7%82%B9%E7%A0%94%E5%8F%91%E8%AE%A1%E5%88%92/19395314

[13] http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/csc/20340/20289/24107/index.html

[14] http://www.xinhuanet.com/2019-03/27/c_1124287185.htm

[15] http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/nsfc/cen/xmtj/pdf/2018_table.pdf

[16] http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/csc/20345/20348/pdf/2018/201802150.pdf

[17] http://www.most.gov.cn/mostinfo/xinxifenlei/czyjs/201804/P020180413411369061914.pdf

[18] https://www.hsmap.com/static/%E3%80%8A%E4%B8%AD%E5%9B%BD%E7%94%9F%E7%89%A9%E5%8C%BB%E8%8D%AF%E4%BA%A7%E4%B8%9A%E5%8F%91%E5%B1%95%E8%93%9D%E7%9A%AE%E4%B9%A6%E3%80%8B.pdf

[19] https://www.ubs.com/global/en/wealth-management/chief-investment-office/our-research/discover-more/2018/china-biotech/_jcr_content/mainpar/toplevelgrid_738393885/col2/linklist/link.0452222404.file/bGluay9wYXRoPS9jb250ZW50L2RhbS9hc3NldHMvd20vZ2xvYmFsL2Npby9kb2MvY2hpbmEtYmlvdGVjaC1yZXZvbHV0aW9uLWVuZ2xpc2gtZXgtdXMucGRm/china-biotech-revolution-english-ex-us.pdf

A Roundup of Recent E-commerce IPOs

From Mogujie (NYSE: MOGU) to Ruhan (NASDAQ: RUHN) to Yunji (NASDAQ: YJ), a series of second-tier (in terms of size at least) Chinese e-commerce companies has filed with SEC and raised $66.5 million, $125 million, $121 million respectively (excluding any over-allotment option).

The interests were stirred by (at least) the capital market success of Pinduoduo.

In its IPO, Pinduoduo was valued at $23.8 billion including all outstanding share options, compared with a valuation of $15 billion following a funding round in April, 2018. (Reuters)

users comparison at PDD’s IPO vs. Taobao, JD | Source: Bloomberg, Jiguang

Following the IPO in July last year, Pinduoduo raised another $1,375 million in February at $25 per ADS (IPO priced at $19 for ~$1.6 billion).


However, it seems that only Pinduoduo could maintain a high valuation.

Partially due to a bad timing, Mogu, valued at $3 billion in 2016 and seeking a valuation of $4 billion in early 2018, reduced its target and was priced at the lower end for $1.3 billion. The previous valuation was derived from a merger tho.

Mogu Inc. ended its New York debut at the same price as its initial public offering $14, after dipping as much as 15% during the day. [Caixing]

As of May 17, 2019, Mogu closed at $5.4 per ADS, down more than 61% from the IPO price of $14.

Ruhan, or Ruhhn, slipped 37% below its IPO price on the first day of trading following a $125 million NASDAQ offering. [AVCJ]

As of May 17, 2019, it closed at $4.25 per ADS, down more than 66% from the IPO price of $12.5.

Yunji, debuted this month, has maintained $0.01 above its IPO price of $11 as of May 17, 2019. Yunji’s valuation is more supported by its revenue (EV/revenue multiple is close to 1).


And a roundup of multiples at IPO, using an exchange ratio of 6.8

EV/GMV EV/Revenue
PDD 0.28 10.19
MOGU 0.43 7.06
RUHN 2.34 5.72
YJ 0.56 0.98

 

Hong Kong Biotech IPOs – How Are They Doing

Filing Date Prospectus Date
HKG:1672 Ascletis Pharma Inc 歌礼制药 05/07/2018 7/20/2018
HKG:2552 Hua Medicine 華領醫藥 06/06/2018 8/31/2018
HKG:1801 Innovent Biologics Inc 信達生物 06/28/2018 10/18/2018
HKG:6185 Cansino Biologics Inc 康希諾生物 7/17/2018 3/18/2019
HKG:6160 Beigene Ltd 百濟神州 7/24/2018 7/30/2018
HKG:1877 Shanghai Junshi Biosciences Co Ltd 君實生物 08/06/2018 12/11/2018
HKG:2616 CStone Pharmaceuticals 基石藥業 11/11/2018 2/14/2019

Money Flows: Raise By Bonds And Invest In Growth

Corporate bonds are popular, especially those sold by companies that have strong cash flows like Tencent and Saudi Aramco.

For investors, investments in those bonds are not as volatile as equities.

For corporates, there is no dilution in earnings and they could benefit from growth investments with low cost of capital.


Two recent examples (this week): Tencent and Saudi Aramco.

Tencent has been a very active investor in Chinese and global markets. It is one of the two modern “empires” rooted in China (the other being Alibaba). Some of its global investment include:

Tencent just announced that it has raised $6 billion in a bond sale, including $2 billion in fixed and floating rate five-year notes, $500 million in seven-year notes, $3 billion in 10-year notes and $500 million in 30-year notes, carrying coupons of 3.280 percent, 3.575 percent, 3.975 percent and 4.525 percent on the fixed rate five-year notes, seven-year notes, 10-year notes and 30-year notes.

Tencent has now caught up with Alibaba, who sold $7 billion bond in November 2017. (2018 is a year of turmoil that no big bond sales are possible)

Saudi Aramco, the world’s biggest oil producer, was the world’s most profitable company in 2018 (almost three times as much as Apple).

And Aramco has planned bond sale would raise around $10+ billion and is meeting investors this week around the globe.

Aramco has a crucial role to play in Saudi Arabia’s diversification from oil production. And an important part of the strategy is to invest in technology and other high-growth sectors around the world through Saudi Arabia’s Public Investment Fund (PIF), a major backer ($45 billion over 5 years) of Softbank Vision Fund since 2016.


Essentially, Saudi (and PIF) and Tencent are getting low-cost capital from bond sales and invest in tech. And the risks for bond investors are low, given Aramco’s core assets/cash flows and Tencent’s ubiquitous presence in Chinese economy.

It’s gonna be a good time for startup companies that fit Tencent’s or Saudi’s appetite…

Middlemen’s Hard Time… PBMs

It has been more than a month since the 7 major drug manufacturers’ CEOs testified before the congress on February 26.

One of the “problems” that pharma CEOs complained about was pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) or the middleman problem.

In a healthcare system involving drugmakers, PBMs, pharmacies, insurers, patients, etc., one of the premises behind CVS’s $70 billion acquisition of Aetna and Cigna’s $54 billion acquisition of Express Scripts might actually make them vulnerable in front of regulators: their bargain power.

CVS Health, Cigna, McKesson, Rite Aid, Walgreens… companies with relatively large exposure between pharmaceutical companies and patients/payers are having a very hard time.

Source: Author, Yahoo Finance

What’s ahead – on March 13, the same committee (Senate Finance Committee) said it has called 5 major PBMs to testify on April 3 (tomorrow…)

    • Cigna
    • CVS
    • Humana
    • OptumRx
    • Prime Therapeutics

They must have been prepared.

Stay stunned.

Lyft On Nasdaq

The first of a series of tech IPOs – Lyft debuted on Nasdaq today. With its stock priced at $72, Lyft is offering 32,500,000 shares of its Class A common stock, plus up to an additional 4,875,000 shares (raised $351 million in total).

The market cap excludes things like RSUs to be issued: 1) 77,390,807 shares of our Class A common stock reserved for future issuance under our equity compensation plans 2) 31,605,338 shares of our Class A common stock subject to RSUs outstanding, but for which the time-based vesting condition was not satisfied as of December 31, 2018 (including 15,065,349 shares of our Class A common stock subject to RSUs granted after December 31, 2018) 3) 7,037,379 shares of our Class A common stock issuable upon the exercise of options to purchase shares of our Class A common stock outstanding as of December 31, 2018 (weighted average $4.74 exercise price)

MSCI China A Shares Inclusion (2): 253 Large-cap and 168 Mid-cap

Following up on the previous post of MSCI’s inclusion of 236 China A Shares last year, I created another list (in excel format) according to the recent update.

MSCI A-share List_2019Feb

MSCI will increase the weight of China A shares in the MSCI Indexes according to the following schedule:

  • Step 1: MSCI will increase the index inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 5% to 10% and add ChiNext Large Cap shares with a 10% inclusion factor coinciding with the May 2019 Semi Annual Index Review.
  • Step 2: MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 10% to 15% coinciding with the August 2019 Quarterly Index Review.
  • Step 3: MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 15% to 20% and add China A Mid Cap shares, including eligible ChiNext shares, with a 20% inclusion factor to the MSCI Indexes coinciding with the November 2019 Semi-Annual Index Review.

On completion of this three-step implementation, there will be 253 Large and 168 Mid Cap China A shares, including 27 ChiNext shares, on a pro forma basis in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, representing a weight of 3.3% in the pro forma index.

Again, there is no clear/editable list publicly available… Always a list in jpeg/png format.

Compared to the list of 236 large-cap stocks last year, there are 24 additions and 7 deletions, listed in separate sheets. (236+24-7=253)