Blog

Pokemon GO Rises Again

It seems to some that the Pokemon GO fever was in 2016-ish and has lost the momentum.

It seems to me though, the game has never been dead and might be the first AR mobile game platform with a massive user base [and to introduce a new way of social interaction/entertainment]

Actually the company behind the game, Niantic, just raised $245 million at a nearly $4 billion valuation in January.

So what is new for Pokémon GO if it is not dead.

Social features.

1. Pokémon GO introduces friends features that can send daily gifts to each other and trade pokemons. Making friends and leveling up the friendship level will earn lots of exp. In September 2018, Niantic said “more than 113 million Friend connections have been made and 2.2 billion Gifts have been sent to friends” since the end of June (in two month total)

2. Gym system reworked to encourage team play (June 2017) + raid boss introduced at gym (July 2017). Gyms are where trainers use Pokémon’s to defend/attack and essentially defending a gym will need more legitimate teamwork. (Less of a broken gym system before) The raid system is a smart design. Legendary Pokémon raids reengaged many players. The most recent Rayquaza raid is high expected (should give Pokémon Go some good statistics to show growth/relevance).

3. Battle system. Although introduced before, it was improved recently. All skill sets now have two numbers: damage in gyms and damage in battle. It will be much more raiser to design a balanced battle system now. And that will be the basis of Pokémon tournament/E-sport.

4. AR photos. The system is working well and has a lot more features to add. I could imagine many fun photos can be taken with Pokémon’s in real world settings. Also, taking a selfie with legendary Pokémon’s will give a sense of achievement and more purpose of playing. Moreover, it could be fun with multiple players/pokemons at the same place and more natural interactions implemented.

Strong IP is such a valuable asset.

Pokemon GO park (like a Disneyland, smaller) would be very doable. It might be the first AR park to be built. More fun in the park with AR glasses and phones.

Some more social community events could be designed. It has already incorporated events that celebrate holidays around the world. Pokémon GO could be a lifestyle. (A healthy one in terms of all the walking)

Tesla Model Y Revealed

March 14, 2019 at Tesla’s design studio in Los Angeles.

Debut of Model Y – the full event below:

With introductory version priced at $39K,  Model Y will start to deliver next year with premium versions first.

Source: Tesla.com

In terms of design, it is more like 7-seats version of Model 3. In fact, they share around 75 percent of its components. (good for supply chain management and another win for modular design)

The “SEXY” lineup has now completed.

Then what is next for Tesla besides mass production and updates of these models?

Bringing Tesla to Mars is one thing mentioned during the event. But that is SpaceX’s work.

Infrastructure for global adoption of EV and solar power is definitely a sexy target to work towards. But that will also rely on governments’ and other organizations’ efforts.

Tesla Semi (the e-truck) is also on the way to deliver. It will be Tesla’s Business Solution, which is different from what Tesla has been doing all the time – selling to consumers. Could Tesla become a service company? E-truck + autopilot as a service? It could be a good spin-off.

[Update March 15] Another product teased on the event is Tesla’s e-pickup truck. [More on e-truck]

Smaller e-vehicles + autopilot? for food/grocery delivery on sidewalks. Possible.

Or bigger flying e-vehicles? Possible but requires a lot more new designs/engineering. Would be a tough sell for investors. Besides, Musk seems to be more interested in next-generation transportation underground (with the Boring Company) than in the air.

Boeing…

Twin Accidents

  1. On October 29, 2018, Lion Air Flight 610, a 737 MAX 8 registration PK-LQP, crashed into the Java Sea 13 minutes after takeoff, killing all 189 passengers and crew.
  2. On March 10, 2019, Ethiopian Airlines Flight 302, a 737 MAX 8 registration ET-AVJ, crashed approximately 6 minutes after takeoff, killing all 149 passengers and 8 crew members on board.

Countries Ordered Grounding

  • On March 11, 2019, China was the first country to order all 96 of its 737 MAX aircraft grounded
  • On March 12, 2019, Europe and India join wave of countries grounding the 737 Max
  • On March 13, 2019, U.S. regulators joined the global chorus by grounding the plane
Source: bbc.com

Undelivered Orders

Boeing produces 52 aircraft per month and its newest version, the MAX, represents the lion’s share of production, although Boeing declined to break out exact numbers. [oann.com]

As of January 2019, Boeing had 5,011 firm orders from 78 identified customers for the 737 MAX. The top three identified airline customers for the 737 MAX are Southwest Airlines with 280 orders, Flydubai with 251 orders, and Lion Air with 201 orders. [Wikipedia]

Source: Wikipedia

The order book for its 737 Max is worth more than $600 billion according to Bloomberg.

Boeing’s stock closed at $422.54 per share before the accident and closed at $377.14 per share on March 11. ( -10.74%, after 3 days and all major markets grounded the plane)

With its 564.99M shares outstanding, the market value decreased by ~$25.8 billion. It seems that investors are more optimistic than I thought. With immediate delivery delayed/cancelled, the order value should shrink by a lot (50% discount * 10% profit * $600 billion = $30 billion; 2018 total net income ~$10 billion), plus the future loss of revenue on maintenance, loss of orders/bargain power due to the trust/brand damage.

Airlines may just switch to Boeing’s other aircrafts tho.

 

Tech Companies = Governments

This will be a large topic and won’t be easy to discuss in a systematic way. I will write down some thoughts in bullet points and revisit later.

  • The idea has occurred to me several times. Essentially, government is an organization and so does a company. Although organizations have different scopes, different formats of running, there must be some similarities.
  • We usually say companies are to maximize shareholders’ value (short-run and long-run). But when the long-run is long enough, we shall see something interesting: the companies are paying extreme attention to building an ecosystem, to maintaining a healthy community/marketplace, to maximizing users’ satisfaction, etc.
  • Tech companies very much rely on users’ opinion. They listen to users. Users have the option to walk away just like immigration. Tech companies need users’ inputs/choices to build apps they use, to maintain the virtual world they live. The self-governance is impressive, especially in blockchain-based applications that users can decide/vote.
  • Tech companies are responsible to protect users from malware or harmful contents/users. They can block an IP address or a user account just like putting someone into prison. They can reject his/her entrance into the community.
  • Tech companies have their own rules or bottom lines that act as laws/judges, with the help of self-governance.
  • There are many free services as long as you are one of its users (or citizens)
  • They provide infrastructures and ways to interact (emails, postal services, freeways)
  • Users pay taxes such as data. In other cases, users share what they earned through tech companies (e.g. marketplace organizers by them)

FDA’s Updated Biosimilars Naming Policy

Two days after Mr. Gottlieb announced his departure from the FDA within a month on March 5, he released an updated draft guidance on biologics naming policy, adding another accomplishment in the last month of his tenure.

The question at the core is how to market “generic versions” of biologics, aka biosimilars. Unlike generic versions of traditional drugs, which could achieve a very confident level of equivalence to their original forms, the difference between biosimilars and their originals are “theoretically” high.

A biosimilar is a biological product that is highly similar to and has no clinically meaningful differences from an existing FDA-approved reference product.

– FDA

The naming policy comes into play to assert that difference.

For interchangeable biosimilars, the agency will designate a proper name that combines the core name and a distinguishing suffix that is devoid of meaning and composed of 4 lowercase letters.

– FDA

It is another confirmation that, biosimilars will not provide the similar competition as generics [to traditional drugs].

Biosimilars can be seen as lower-priced branded drugs. And it will really need real-world experiences to tell the interchangeability and other considerations.

A new biosimilar approval could be seen as providing a new solution, instead of providing a less expensive version of the current solution, to patients.

「Video of the Week」CRISPR-edited Bacteria As A Storage of Data

First video stored in its digital form in bacteria’s DNA, with the help from CRISPR/Cas9 gene editing.

DNA as a storage is not an entirely new idea. Microsoft has been exploring this field with Twist at least since 2016. They have successfully stored music (audio) performances in DNA in 2017.

Now (in the video), researchers at Harvard Medical School and the Wyss Institute are using live organisms.

MSCI China A Shares Inclusion (2): 253 Large-cap and 168 Mid-cap

Following up on the previous post of MSCI’s inclusion of 236 China A Shares last year, I created another list (in excel format) according to the recent update.

MSCI A-share List_2019Feb

MSCI will increase the weight of China A shares in the MSCI Indexes according to the following schedule:

  • Step 1: MSCI will increase the index inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 5% to 10% and add ChiNext Large Cap shares with a 10% inclusion factor coinciding with the May 2019 Semi Annual Index Review.
  • Step 2: MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 10% to 15% coinciding with the August 2019 Quarterly Index Review.
  • Step 3: MSCI will increase the inclusion factor of all China A Large Cap shares in the MSCI Indexes from 15% to 20% and add China A Mid Cap shares, including eligible ChiNext shares, with a 20% inclusion factor to the MSCI Indexes coinciding with the November 2019 Semi-Annual Index Review.

On completion of this three-step implementation, there will be 253 Large and 168 Mid Cap China A shares, including 27 ChiNext shares, on a pro forma basis in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, representing a weight of 3.3% in the pro forma index.

Again, there is no clear/editable list publicly available… Always a list in jpeg/png format.

Compared to the list of 236 large-cap stocks last year, there are 24 additions and 7 deletions, listed in separate sheets. (236+24-7=253)

 

MSCI China A Shares Inclusion (1): 234 -> 226 -> 236 Large-cap

One thing I found very odd when doing some research on the recent inclusion of China’s A-shares into MSCI’s indexes – there is even no easily-accessible and “readable” list…

“Lists” I saw are in the format of pictures.. not usable, considering the number of stocks are in hundreds.

(Really don’t understand why a simple list is protected… and available in uneditable form…)

And there is no consistent track of inclusion/exclusion of stocks publicly available.

Given that, I created excel lists [MSCI China A Shares List] of tickers proposed by MSCI with a history of different versions in 2018.

[For 2019 versions, please see the next post]

In this post, three versions are shared:

  1. 5/15/2018 version with 234 stocks ->
  2. 5/31/2018 version with 226 stocks (8 are removed due to reasons like suspension of trading, lack of buying opportunity, etc.) ->
  3. 8/31/2018 version with 236 stocks (10 are added)

From 1 to 2, the 8 deleted stocks are:

  • 002310 东方园林 (停牌原因)
  • 600170 上海建工 (调出沪股通标的)
  • 601390 中国中铁 (停牌原因)
  • 600369 西南证券 (调出沪股通标的)
  • 002450 ST康得新 (停牌原因)
  • 000825 太钢不锈 (停牌原因)
  • 601118 海南橡胶 (调出沪股通标的, 停牌原因)
  • 000063 中兴通讯 (停牌原因)

From 2 to 3, the 10 added stocks are:

  • 600760 中航沈飞
  • 601088 中国神华
  • 600050 中国联通
  • 600795 国电电力
  • 600346 恒力股份
  • 600406 国电南瑞
  • 000100 TCL 集团
  • 000063 中兴通讯
  • 600588 用友网络
  • 601966 玲珑轮胎

Mark Zuckerberg’s Post on Privacy

Today, the person at the center of today’s privacy/data issues commented with his thoughts and future moves of Facebook.

[Read Zuckerberg’s original post here]

End-to-end encryption and secure data centers are the two most important things touted by Facebook’s CEO.

“In a few years, I expect future versions of Messenger and WhatsApp to become the main ways people communicate on the Facebook network.”

[WhatsApp is the leader in end-to-end encryption and was acquired by Facebook in 2014 for $22 billion total]

[Read more on the conflict between Facebook and WhatsApp after acquisition]

However, there is one big mismatch – users don’t care what technics FB is using; they care if people they don’t know know them well. Essentially, users will still feel their information is sold if they saw tailored ads in WhatsApp. They only care about results. And that’s where Apple’s iMessenger wins. Users don’t know what efforts Apple is making but they don’t see ads.

What’s more…

“Beyond that, significant thought needs to go into all of the services we build on top of that foundation — from how people do payments and financial transactions, to the role of businesses and advertising, to how we can offer a platform for other private services.”

Yes Facebook will do payments and issue blockchain-related or other forms of cryptocurrencies/units.