Blog

Model pricing comparison

Meta’s pricing is amazing – it targets eliminate Claude’s gross profit if Muse Spark capability can catch up.

Model Input ($/1M tokens) Output ($/1M tokens)
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 $1.25 $4.25
Claude Sonnet ~$3 ~$15
Claude Opus ~$5 ~$25

With cached input.

Model Input ($/1M) Cached Input ($/1M) Output ($/1M) Cached discount
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 $1.25 $0.15 $4.25 88%
Claude Sonnet $3.00 $0.30 $15.00 90%
Claude Opus $5.00 $0.50 $25.00 90%

However, compare that with DeepSeek.

Model Input / 1M Cached input / 1M Output / 1M
DeepSeek V4 Flash RMB 1 / $0.15 RMB 0.02 / $0.003  RMB 2 / $0.3
DeepSeek V4 Pro  RMB 3 / $0.44 RMB 0.025 / $0.0037 RMB 6 / $0.89

Zhipu could see some trouble…

 

Model Input / 1M Cached input / 1M Output / 1M
Zhipu GLM-5.2 RMB 8$1.18 RMB 2 / $0.3 RMB 28 / $4.13
Meta Muse Spark 1.1 $1.25 $0.15 $4.25
DeepSeek V4 Pro  RMB 3 RMB 0.025 RMB 6

US hyperscalers drawdown from peak

 

Company Peak close Subsequent bottom close Peak-to-bottom drawdown
Oracle (ORCL) $328.33 — Sep. 10, 2025 $140.27 — Jul. 2, 2026 −57.3%
Microsoft (MSFT) $542.07 — Oct. 28, 2025 $352.83 — Jun. 25, 2026 −34.9%
Meta (META) $790.00 — Aug. 12, 2025 $525.72 — Mar. 27, 2026 −33.5%
Amazon (AMZN) $274.99 — May 6, 2026 $227.01 — Jun. 25, 2026 −17.4%
Alphabet (GOOGL) $402.62 — May 13, 2026 $337.39 — Jun. 26, 2026 −16.2%

Technically meta was not a hyperscaler.

FCF turning negative and shifting to memory makers is the biggest concern.

The AI death, zoombies, and unsustainables

Some of the notable AI services have been sunset, both in the US and in China.

In March 2026, Sora shutdown was officially announced. The consumer web and app experiences were shut down on April 26, 2026, while the developer API will end on September 24, 2026.

In Sep 2025, 秒鸭相机 (owned by Alibaba) has dissolved the team and news broke out in May 2026.

Baidu’s 文心一言 / Yiyan / Ernie Bot commercialization (membership-based) has not worked; Baidu announced the sunset of paid membership in Feb 2025 and began refund in Apr 2025. The chat function of frontier LLMs in China is basically free for all, but the paid subscription had previously cost about RMB 59.9 per month.

 

Yiyan service itself has been moved/remade/rebranded.

 

There are many more.

e.g. in China

Product Company Type Date/status What happened
Glow MiniMax AI companion March 2023 Removed following complaints involving sensitive content and privacy. It never returned under the Glow name; MiniMax later launched 星野. (21 Economic Net)
Trik AI Xiaohongshu AI image generation Late 2023 Shut after controversy and litigation over artists’ work; Xiaohongshu subsequently launched 奇域AI. (36Kr)
未伴 Tencent Music/QQ Music AI companion and social app June 2024 Removed amid regulatory scrutiny of AI-companion content. Mainland services were discontinued rather than merely renamed. (21 Economic Net)
腾讯翻译君 Tencent AI translation March 13, 2025 Web, app and mini-program all ceased operating. Translation functionality increasingly became part of 元宝 and Tencent’s larger products. (36Kr)
万物追踪 MiniMax AI information monitoring Around April 2025 Entered public testing in January 2025 and was comprehensively delisted less than three months later. (36Kr)
鹿班智能设计 Alibaba Automated advertising/design June 30, 2025 All services ended after Alibaba had already stopped purchases and renewals. (36Kr)
奇域AI Xiaohongshu Chinese-style AI images June 30, 2025 Standalone service closed; some functionality was transferred to Xiaohongshu’s 镜构 mini-program. (36Kr)
腾讯智影 Tencent AI video and digital humans June 30, 2025 Officially described as a platform “renovation,” but login ended, user data was cleared and its official account was later cancelled. This is best treated as an effective indefinite closure. (36Kr)
异世界回响 Soul AI character companion Around September 2025 Reported withdrawn/stopped as Soul reduced its standalone AI-companion experiments. The exact final server date was not clearly published. (36Kr)
狸谱 Independent startup AIGC anime and fan-art community October 31, 2025 Officially ceased operation despite reportedly reaching around one million monthly active users during its peak. (36Kr)
冒泡鸭 StepFun/阶跃星辰 AI role-play companion November 5, 2025 Formally stopped operating after exceeding six million cumulative downloads, according to third-party app data cited by Chinese media. (36Kr)
讯飞写作 iFlytek AI writing November 30, 2025 Officially terminated; users were instructed to export their content before closure. (36Kr)
XEVA / X Eva Xiaoice/小冰 AI clones and companionship November 30, 2025 Ended all operating services. (36Kr)
Wow AI Meituan AI friend and character chat December 18, 2025 Servers closed and users could no longer access their accounts. (36Kr)
纸飞机AI ModelBest/面壁智能 AI companion Reported exited in 2025 Included in the 2025 shutdown census, although no precise public server-closure date was located. (36Kr)
momoAI 清杉信息 AI companion Reported exited in 2025 Listed among discontinued or withdrawn AI-companion products; detailed closure documentation is limited. (36Kr)
我在AI 有零科技 AI companion Reported exited in 2025 Reported as withdrawn or no longer maintained; no clear public final-service notice was found. (36Kr)
AiU 爱哟 Zhipu AI/智谱 AI companion Reported exited in H2 2025 Standalone companion experiment was withdrawn as Zhipu concentrated resources elsewhere. Exact date is unclear. (36Kr)
Lumi 噜米 禹幻科技 AI emotional companion Reported exited in H2 2025 Included in the companion-app withdrawal wave, but its final backend-shutdown date was not publicly documented. (36Kr)
梯子AI Baidu AI search March 4, 2026 Shut after operating for roughly six months; its site and app-store listings disappeared and functions moved into the 文心 app. (Sina Finance)

Some have become “zombies”.

Product Company Condition as of June 30, 2026
胃之书 Independent team Had gone at least five months without an update by late 2025; user-feedback groups were reportedly nonfunctional or muted. No formal shutdown announcement, but it appeared close to natural abandonment. (36Kr)
AskXBOT 澜码科技 The company experienced unpaid wages, staff reductions and severe financing problems. AskXBOT appeared stalled, although the company website remained accessible, so it cannot be called a clean server shutdown. (Sina Finance)
Vega AI Independent team Included in the Chinese-media census of delisted or long-unmaintained AI applications. I found no reliable official closure notice or exact date. (36Kr)
开搜AI 快搜-related team Listed as delisted or long-term unmaintained, but public evidence is insufficient to establish a precise final shutdown date. (36Kr)
晓象 Startup project Reportedly encountered major operating and financing problems. Its product activity appears substantially stalled, but evidence does not support a precise “servers shut on X date” claim. (36Kr)
小星星AI陪练 星星趣弹 Included in the 2025 inactive-app census, but third-party download pages continued to appear. I would label it unconfirmed/inactive, rather than fully closed. (36Kr)

Many can be found in the US.

Product What it did Shutdown date What happened
Huxe Turned emails, calendars, webpages and prompts into personalized AI audio briefings/podcasts May 28, 2026 Removed from the app stores and stopped functioning. The founders said the team was moving on and would discontinue the product. (TechCrunch)
Rewind Mac app that continuously recorded and made users’ screen and audio history searchable December 19, 2025 Following Meta’s acquisition of Limitless, the Rewind app’s screen and audio capture was disabled. Limitless’s Pendant service continued for existing users in supported regions, so only Rewind and other non-Pendant functionality were sunset. (Limitless)
Yara AI AI mental-wellness and therapy-style chatbot By November 2025 The founder voluntarily wound down the service, citing concerns that AI chatbots were not safe enough for people experiencing serious mental-health situations. Its website now carries a farewell notice and directs users to other resources. (Yara AI)
Dot by New Computer Personalized AI friend, confidante and companion October 5, 2025 New Computer sunset Dot after its co-founders decided to pursue different directions. Users were given one month to export their conversations and other data. (TechCrunch)
Woebot consumer app CBT-based mental-health chatbot June 30, 2025 The direct-to-consumer Woebot app was retired; existing accounts became inaccessible. Woebot Health itself did not entirely disappear and continued working on institutional and provider-oriented applications. (Woebot Health)
Builder.ai Claimed to use AI to make developing apps and websites easier Operations collapsed in May 2025 The Microsoft-backed company entered insolvency after financial problems, debt defaults and frozen or seized cash left it unable to continue operating normally. Its main U.S. entity subsequently filed for bankruptcy in June. (Financial Times)
Humane Ai Pin services Screenless wearable assistant for AI queries, calls, messages and cloud-stored content February 28, 2025 Humane sold key assets to HP and switched off its servers. Calling, messaging, AI responses and cloud access stopped working, leaving most Pins substantially unusable. (The Verge)
Coqui AI commercial operations AI voice generation, speech synthesis and voice cloning January 2024 The startup and its hosted commercial services shut down amid funding and monetization difficulties. The underlying open-source TTS code survived through community forks, so the technology itself did not vanish. (GitHub)
Artifact AI-personalized news reader created by Instagram’s co-founders Wound down during 2024 Artifact announced that its market opportunity was insufficient and began winding down its app. Its core news reader remained alive longer than originally planned, before Yahoo acquired its technology and incorporated elements into Yahoo News. (Medium)
OpenAI AI Text Classifier Website that attempted to identify whether text was written by AI July 20, 2023 OpenAI withdrew it because of its low accuracy rate. It was a particularly clean example of a product being shut down because the underlying AI simply did not work reliably enough. (OpenAI)
Neeva consumer search Subscription-based, ad-free search engine that added generative-AI answers and citations June 2, 2023 Neeva could not attract enough users to make the consumer search business sustainable. The search website closed, user data was deleted and the company’s technology and team subsequently moved to Snowflake. (Search Engine Land)

 

Hyperliquid’s edge

Seems to me that Hyperliquid is the only major platform that doesn’t need KYC..

On app.hyperliquid.xyz, you can:

  • Click Connect
  • Enter an email address
  • Enter the six-digit code
  • Hyperliquid creates a blockchain wallet address for that email
  • Deposit funds and trade

It doesn’t need KYC Because Hyperliquid currently treats itself as a non-custodial blockchain protocol/interface, rather than a conventional exchange holding customer accounts.

The caveat is that there is no direct fiat deposits and it’s all on-chain settlement.

The Rise and Fall of Gold: From the Asian Financial Crisis to 2013

Gold’s journey is a textbook of financial / world history. The cycle developed in stages: the end of a long bear market, the monetary response to the dot-com crash, China’s commodity boom, the 2008 financial crisis, the Eurozone debt crisis, and finally the reversal of the crisis-era gold trade.

Chapter 1: The Asian Financial Crisis

The metal averaged roughly $332 per ounce in 1997, fell below $300 during 1998, and remained depressed through the end of the decade.

At first glance, this appears strange. A financial crisis should seemingly increase demand for a safe asset such as gold. What happened exactly?

What is the nature of this crisis? Asian banks and corporations across the region had borrowed heavily in dollars, often at short maturities. When foreign capital suddenly left, local currencies collapsed and borrowers urgently needed dollars to repay their debts. The IMF describes how a sudden reversal of capital flows pushed Asian currencies into a downward spiral and left many dollar borrowers insolvent.

That created intense demand for the dollar itself and dollar rose dramatically against asian currencies. Because gold is quoted internationally in dollars, dollar strength placed downward pressure on the USD gold price. The crisis also weakened incomes and jewelry demand across important Asian gold-consuming markets.

Western central-bank behavior added further pressure. During the 1990s, European reserve managers sold or lent substantial amounts of gold. The World Gold Council says persistent official selling helped push gold toward $250 per ounce and eventually led to the 1999 Washington Agreement, which limited coordinated sales.

Plus, this was a period with high Fed interest rate. The Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) raised the intended federal funds rate to 5.5% in March 1997 and held it steady for over a year. As the crisis caused a “flight to safety” and threatened the US economy through spillovers like the Long-Term Capital Management collapse, the Fed cut rates three times between September and December 1998 by a total of 0.75% – but still not low as compared with periods after dot-com bubble burst.

Yet gold did not necessarily fail as a safe asset for Asian households. The correct measure was not simply gold in dollars, but gold in local currency:

Local gold price = USD gold price × local-currency price of the dollar.

If gold declined 10% in dollars while a local currency lost 50% of its value, gold would still rise sharply in that local currency. Someone who already owned gold before the devaluation could preserve purchasing power even though the international dollar price of gold was falling.

The problem was timing. Once a currency had collapsed, gold immediately became much more expensive locally. Households facing unemployment, debt repayments or bank failures often needed to sell existing gold for liquidity rather than buy more. Gold was therefore effective insurance for those who held it before the crisis, but it was not a cheap hedge that everyone could purchase after the panic had begun.

The Asian crisis showed that “safe haven” is a relative concept. During a scramble for dollar liquidity, the dollar can outperform gold internationally. At the same time, gold can still protect investors against the collapse of their own currency.

Chapter 2: The Dot-Com Bubble Burst

A first institutional turning point came on September 26, 1999, when European central banks announced the Washington Agreement on Gold. The agreement followed concern that uncoordinated central-bank sales were “destabilising the market, driving the gold price sharply down.”

However, gold did not immediately enter a sustained bull market. U.S. technology stocks were booming, the dollar remained strong, and the Federal Reserve was tightening monetary policy.

When the dot-com bubble peaked in March 2000, gold traded at approximately $285–290 per ounce. Rather than rallying immediately as technology shares collapsed, gold continued to weaken.

The Fed raised the federal-funds target to 6.0% on March 21, 2000, and then to 6.5% on May 16. High cash yields and a strong dollar made non-yielding gold relatively unattractive.

Gold eventually fell toward approximately $256–260 per ounce in Mar/Apr 2001. Gold bottoms about 13 months after the Nasdaq peak, not at the same time.Its delayed response demonstrated that gold is not simply the inverse of technology stocks. The initial bursting of an equity bubble was insufficient to produce a gold bull market while monetary policy remained restrictive.

Chapter 3: Fed Easing, 9/11, China’s WTO Entry, and China-Led Commodity Cycle

The decisive monetary shift came in 2001. As the technology downturn spread into the wider economy, the Fed began cutting rates in January 2021. The federal-funds target fell from 6.5% in late 2000 to 1.75% by December 2001, and later reached 1% in June 2003.

Gold began recovering as investors anticipated lower returns on cash, weaker economic growth and an eventual decline in the dollar. Lower nominal and expected real rates begin reducing the opportunity cost of holding gold. The market starts anticipating a sustained easy-money regime.

 

Fed decision date Cut New target Gold AM fix Gold PM fix
Jan. 3, 2001 −50 bp 6.00% $269.00 $267.15
Jan. 31, 2001 −50 bp 5.50% $266.20 $264.50
Mar. 20, 2001 −50 bp 5.00% $262.60 $261.55
Apr. 18, 2001 −50 bp 4.50% $260.10 $258.85
May 15, 2001 −50 bp 4.00% $268.05 $266.60
Jun. 27, 2001 −25 bp 3.75% $276.00 $274.80
Aug. 21, 2001 −25 bp 3.50% $276.95 $276.30
Sep. 17, 2001 −50 bp 3.00% $291.00 $293.25
Oct. 2, 2001 −50 bp 2.50% $291.10 $291.65
Nov. 6, 2001 −50 bp 2.00% $278.90 $278.95
Dec. 11, 2001 −25 bp 1.75% $272.60 $272.20

The September 11 attacks increased safe-haven demand and prompted additional monetary easing.

In 2001, gold held above its April 2001 low but remained only around the high-$270s at year-end.

A second structural change arrived when China joined the World Trade Organization on December 11, 2001. The WTO later described the accession as a “pivotal event,” noting that accession-related reforms contributed to China’s economic transformation and modernization.

China’s WTO entry did not cause a one-day surge in gold. Its importance was prospective. Financial markets began anticipating years of export growth, foreign investment, factory construction, infrastructure spending and urbanization.

That expectation was especially powerful for oil, copper, iron ore and other industrial commodities. Gold’s relationship was less direct, but it participated in the broader commodity allocation as investors began treating commodities as a distinct asset class.

From 2002 through 2008, gold rose every calendar year on a year-end basis.

Year Annual average Year-end price Year-end return
2002 $310 $342.75 +24.0%
2003 $363 $417.25 +21.7%
2004 $410 $435.60 +4.4%
2005 $445 $513.00 +17.8%
2006 $604 about $636 +24%
2007 $695 about $836 +32%
2008 $872 about $870 +4%

From 2002 onward, gold rose alongside the commodity supercycle. It benefited from Chinese growth, a weakening dollar, higher energy prices, geopolitical uncertainty and an expanding investor allocation to commodities.

The launch of exchange-traded gold products also made the market more accessible. SPDR Gold Shares began trading in the United States in November 2004, allowing investors to gain gold exposure without directly storing bars or coins.

This period cannot simply be described as one of continuously falling interest rates. The Fed raised the federal-funds target from 1% in 2004 to 5.25% in June 2006. Gold nevertheless continued rising because dollar weakness, commodity inflation and investment demand remained supportive.

Chapter 4: The 2008 Global Financial Crisis, The 2011 Eurozone Debt Crisis

The 2008 Global Financial Crisis then changed the nature of the bull market. Gold initially declined during the most intense liquidation as investors sold assets to raise cash. But the collapse of major financial institutions, near-zero policy rates and large-scale central-bank asset purchases turned gold from a commodity-cycle investment into a hedge against systemic and monetary risk. Investors became concerned that quantitative easing, government deficits and rapidly expanding central-bank balance sheets could eventually weaken paper currencies.

The European sovereign-debt crisis and the 2011 downgrade of U.S. government debt reinforced demand for monetary insurance.

On April 23, 2010, Greece formally requested EU-IMF assistance.

In July 2011, euro-area leaders accepted private-sector participation in a second Greek rescue—effectively acknowledging that sovereign bondholders could take losses. This restructuring was widely seen as “voluntary” in name only. Eurozone governments and the IMF made it clear that Greece would default completely without this deal – private banks and investors faced total loss if they refused to participate.. Mainstream financial institutions were heavily pressured by their own national governments to accept the terms.

Soon afterward, yields on Italian and Spanish debt surged, forcing the ECB to resume bond purchases on 7 August 2011. This was the more powerful moment for gold. The crisis was no longer about whether tiny Greece could repay its debts; it was about whether Italy, Spain, European banks and the euro itself could survive.

On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s cut the United States’ long-term sovereign rating from AAA to AA+, the first such downgrade by S&P. Gold surged above $1,770 within days.

By September 2011, gold had risen to almost $1,900 per ounce, with the intraday price briefly reaching approximately $1,921.

In noticeable decline of gold price in later part of 2011 can be explained by crowded positions, some of the worst sovereign fears temporarily easing and Feb extending the maturity of its bond holdings.

As volatility increased, CME raised the collateral required to hold gold-futures positions. A September 23 notice raised speculative initial margin on standard gold futures from $9,450 to $11,475 per contract, effective September 26, 2011. Leveraged traders therefore had to contribute more cash or close positions, intensifying the late-September fall.

During autumn 2011, European leaders advanced a second Greek rescue, bank-recapitalization plans and a larger proposed Greek haircut. Those measures did not solve the crisis, but periodically reduced immediate tail risk. Gold fell on September 15 after European leaders reiterated their commitment to keeping Greece in the euro, encouraging a temporary shift from safe havens into risk assets.

The Fed’s QE2 Treasury-purchase program ended in June 2011. In September, the Fed announced Operation Twist—extending the maturity of its bond holdings—but it did not initially expand the balance sheet in the same way as QE1 or QE2.

Year Annual average Year-end close Annual return
2008 $871.96 $869.75 +4.0%
2009 $972.35 $1,087.50 +25.0%
2010 $1,224.53 $1,420.25 +30.6%
2011 $1,571.52 $1,531.00 +7.8%

In Feb 2012, the subsequent Greece restructuring abandoned the voluntary facade entirely. Greece retroactively inserted laws forcing all bondholders to accept losses if a majority agreed. This forced mechanism triggered insurance payouts (Credit Default Swaps), proving the financial markets viewed it as an involuntary default.

The Greek debt crisis stabilized in mid-2012 from a market standpoint – the acute panic that threatened to destroy the Eurozone was stopped when European Central Bank (ECB) President Mario Draghi famously declared that the ECB would do “whatever it takes” to preserve the euro.

Gold price rose by ~9% in 2012.

Chapter 5: Gold Collapsed in 2013

Gold remained elevated in 2012, but its underlying investment thesis was weakening. The banking system was stabilizing, the U.S. economy was recovering and the large inflation surge feared after quantitative easing had not materialized.

In 2013, investors began anticipating that the Federal Reserve would reduce its bond purchases. Expectations of tapering pushed Treasury and real yields higher, increasing the opportunity cost of owning an asset that pays no interest.

At the same time, confidence in the U.S. recovery improved and equities rallied. Gold was no longer required to provide the same degree of crisis insurance.

Selling through exchange-traded funds magnified the move. Western investors who had accumulated gold during the post-2008 crisis began liquidating positions. Strong buying of jewelry, bars and coins in China and India absorbed large quantities of physical metal, but could not fully offset institutional ETF selling.

Gold ended 2013 down approximately 28%, ending a 12-year sequence of annual gains.

Epilogue

The 2013 decline represented the reversal of the forces that had driven the bull market.

Gold had benefited first from the end of central-bank selling, then from Fed easing and dollar weakness, then from China’s commodity cycle, and finally from fears surrounding the global financial system and unconventional monetary policy.

In 2013, those conditions reversed: real yields rose, confidence recovered and investors began dismantling the crisis-era gold trade.

The complete cycle can therefore be understood in five stages:

1997–1999: Asian currency crisis, dollar strength and central-bank selling depressed gold in USD terms, although gold still protected many local-currency holders.

2000–2001: The dot-com bubble burst, but gold remained weak until the Fed moved decisively from tightening to easing.

2001–2007: China’s WTO accession, dollar weakness and the commodity supercycle supported a broad gold bull market.

2008–2011: The financial crisis, quantitative easing and sovereign-risk concerns transformed gold into monetary insurance.

2013: Rising real yields and improving confidence triggered ETF liquidation and the collapse of the crisis-era trade.

Year Annual average Year-end close Annual return
1997 $331.02 $287.05 −22.2%
1998 $294.24 $288.70 +0.6%
1999 $278.98 $290.25 +0.5%
2000 $279.11 $272.65 −6.1%
2001 $271.04 $276.50 +1.4%
2002 $309.73 $342.75 +24.0%
2003 $363.38 $417.25 +21.7%
2004 $409.72 $435.60 +4.4%
2005 $444.74 $513.00 +17.8%
2006 $603.46 $635.70 +23.9%
2007 $695.39 $836.50 +31.6%
2008 $871.96 $869.75 +4.0%
2009 $972.35 $1,087.50 +25.0%
2010 $1,224.53 $1,420.25 +30.6%
2011 $1,571.52 $1,531.00 +7.8%
2012 $1,668.98 $1,664.00 +8.7%
2013 $1,411.23 $1,204.50 −27.6%

Social paradox

Excerpt from recent readings of When Everyone Knows That Everyone Knows by Steven Pinker,

1. We try to gain status by not caring about status.

2. We rebel against conformity in the same way as everyone else.

3. We show humility to prove we’re better than other people.

4. We don’t care what people think, and we want them to think
this.

5. We make anonymous donations to get credit for not caring about
getting credit.

6. We bravely defy social norms so that people will praise us.

7. We avoid being manipulative to get people to do what we want
them to do.

8. We compete to be less competitive than our rivals.

9. We help those in need, regardless of self-interest, because being
seen as the type of person who helps those in need, regardless of
self-interest, is in our self-interest.

10. We make subversive art that only high-status people appreciate.

11. We make fun of ourselves for being uncool to prove we’re cool.

12. We self-righteously defend false beliefs to prove we care more
about the truth than virtue-signaling.

13. We help our friends without expecting anything in return,
because we know they would do the same for us.

14. We show everyone our true, authentic self—not who society
wants us to be—because that is who society wants us to be.

Large IPO’s impact on peers

PL and ASTS peaked about 2 weeks before SpaceX IPO.

Micron peaked about 2 weeks before SK Hynix ADR listing.

Samsung peaked about 3 weeks before SK Hynix ADR listing.

It’s interesting, isn’t it?

I looked it up for other similar events.

Visa was different.

Mastercard stock rose with Visa debut.

PetroChina A-Share IPO

 

Chapter 1 – The World’s Fastest-Growing Economy

At the beginning of the 21st century, China was transforming faster than any major economy in modern history.

After joining the WTO in 2001, factories spread across the country. Steel mills, cement plants, highways, airports and apartment towers appeared almost overnight. GDP grew at roughly 10–14% annually. Millions of people bought cars for the first time. Every additional factory required electricity; every truck consumed diesel; every construction site demanded asphalt.

China’s oil consumption reflected this transformation.

Between 2000 and 2007, Chinese oil demand nearly doubled, growing from roughly 4.8 million barrels per day to over 7.5 million barrels per day. China became the second-largest oil consumer in the world after the United States.

At the same time, global supply struggled to keep pace.

Years of underinvestment following the late-1990s oil collapse left little spare production capacity. Geopolitical risks—including the Iraq War, unrest in Nigeria, and concerns about Iran—added further uncertainty. Commodity investors began describing the period as the beginning of a “commodity supercycle.”

Crude oil rose relentlessly:

  • 2002: around US$20–30/bbl
  • 2004: above US$40
  • 2005: above US$60
  • 2006: around US$70
  • Mid-2007: above US$75
  • July 2008: eventually reaching US$147/bbl

To many investors, there seemed to be only one conclusion:

China would continue growing forever.

Oil prices would continue rising forever.

Therefore, oil companies would become permanently more profitable.


Chapter 2 – The Perfect National Champion

Among Chinese companies, none symbolized this story better than PetroChina.

Unlike many newly listed private companies, PetroChina represented ownership of China’s most strategic industry.

It controlled massive upstream oil reserves, pipelines, refineries and distribution assets.

To domestic investors, buying PetroChina meant buying China’s economic miracle itself.

The company had already listed H-shares in Hong Kong in 2000 and ADRs in New York.

However, most mainland investors could not easily purchase overseas shares.

The A-share IPO therefore became something entirely different:

For the first time, ordinary Chinese investors could own what many considered the country’s most valuable enterprise.

Demand became extraordinary.


Chapter 3 – The Bubble Already Existed

By late 2007, Chinese equities were already experiencing one of history’s largest valuation bubbles.

The Shanghai Composite had risen from roughly 1,000 points in mid-2005 to more than 6,000.

Retail investors opened brokerage accounts at record speed.

Newspapers discussed stocks on front pages.

Taxi drivers and university students debated IPO allocations.

People queued outside brokerage offices.

Mutual funds sold out within hours.

There was widespread belief that the Chinese government would never allow the stock market to fall significantly.

Liquidity flooded into every large IPO.


Chapter 4 – Valuation Lost Contact With Reality

Internationally, oil companies remained reasonably valued despite high oil prices.

Approximate valuation before the PetroChina A-share IPO:

Company Forward P/E (approx.)
ExxonMobil 10–12×
Chevron 9–11×
BP 9–10×
Shell 9–11×
Total 9–11×

Investors largely assumed oil prices would eventually normalize.

Chinese investors reached a completely different conclusion.

The PetroChina A-share IPO was priced at RMB16.70.

On its first trading day:

  • Open: RMB48.60
  • Intraday high: RMB48.62
  • Close: RMB43.96

At the day’s high, PetroChina briefly became the world’s largest listed company by market capitalization, exceeding US$1 trillion.

Yet the underlying business had not changed.

The same oil fields.

The same refineries.

The same earnings.

Only the market where investors traded the shares had changed.

The implied valuation was estimated at roughly 45–60× earnings depending on methodology—roughly four to six times the multiple of global oil majors.

This was not because PetroChina was dramatically more profitable than ExxonMobil.

It was because investors believed China’s growth would remain extraordinary forever.


Chapter 5 – Scarcity Meets National Optimism

Several forces reinforced one another.

China’s GDP was booming.

Oil prices were making new highs almost every month.

The Shanghai market itself was already euphoric.

Mainland investors had limited investment alternatives.

PetroChina represented both national pride and perceived scarcity.

Many investors believed:

“If China’s economy doubles again, PetroChina must also double.”

Few asked the more important question:

“What if today’s profits already assume exceptionally high oil prices?”

The distinction between a great company and a great investment disappeared.


Chapter 6 – The Peak

On November 5, 2007, PetroChina reached its all-time A-share high during its first minutes of trading.

It would never revisit that price.

Only months later, the global financial crisis began unfolding.

Oil prices collapsed from US$147 to below US$40.

Commodity profits normalized.

Shanghai Composite Index fell by more than 70%.

PetroChina’s valuation gradually converged toward international oil majors.

The company remained one of China’s largest and most important enterprises.

The business largely survived.

The valuation did not.


Epilogue – The Last Buyer

The PetroChina A-share IPO remains one of history’s clearest examples of the difference between a wonderful company and a wonderful stock.

Almost every part of the bullish narrative proved true:

  • China continued becoming a global economic superpower.
  • Oil demand continued growing for years.
  • PetroChina remained enormously profitable.
  • The company remained strategically indispensable.

Yet investors who purchased at the IPO peak suffered enormous long-term losses because they paid a valuation that assumed an almost perfect future.

The lesson was never that PetroChina was a poor business.

The lesson was that even the greatest businesses can become poor investments when narrative, liquidity, scarcity and optimism combine to overwhelm valuation.

That distinction continues to echo in every market cycle—from technology in 2000, to Chinese equities in 2007, to other periods when investors begin believing that “this time is different.”

Bifurcation in AI models and AI infra

Bifurcation is coming.

SOTA (State-of-the-Art) models will collaborate / use the best hardware, i.e. latest GPU from Nvidia, HBM from SK Hynix, etc.

SOTA model war is between OpenAI and Anthropics, plus Google.

Meanwhile, Microsfot and Meta will be another group.

This group will prioritize TCO (Total Cost of Ownership) and use another group of hardware suppliers, like those offered by Qualcomm, announced in Qualcomm Investor Day.