HKD is USD or not?

HKD is pegged to USD. The fixed range is 1 USD = 7.75 – 7.85 HKD.

However, a weird thing is happening recently.

HIBOR (Hong Kong Interbank Offered Rate) is dropping dramatically.

For a USD-pegged currency, its borrowing rate normally increases or decreases with USD, and is similar to USD, otherwise arbitrage may happen.

Fed’s fund rate currently is 4.25% to 4.50%.

HIBOR 1-month dropped from 4% to below 1%. from May to Jun.

May 2nd, 1 Month HIBOR is 3.98363% vs. Jun 19th, it’s 0.53506%

A 350 bps drop in 1.5 month! Crazy world.


Three things may happen:

1/ Fed to decrease interest rate.

That will probably happen within the next 12month, but not in the July meeting.

Possible in Sep and/or Dec meeting.

2/ HK to limit money outflow.

It will become more like mainland.

But why?

HK doesn’t have the incentive to do this. And Beijing also wants a special international finance center.

Thus, unlikely.

However, there might be more mainland’s RMB converting into HKD – think about SOEs.

Since they are under the direction of Chinese gov, they won’t participate in every corner of the global capital market.

These HKD will behave like under the capital control.

3/ HKD-USD peg breaks

Too big a thing.

In short-term, seems unlikely.

In early May, HKMA needs to sell HKD and buy USD.

In early May, the exchange rate hit the strong-side CU of HK$7.75 to US$1 four times on three trading days, during both Hong Kong and non-Hong Kong trading hours. The HKMA sold HK$129.4 billion in exchange for US$16.7 billion in accordance with the LERS mechanism.

After Fed’s rate decision in June, HKMA expects carry trades may drive USD stronger against HKD and makes HIBOR higher.

If carry trades are to persist, the Hong Kong dollar exchange rate may weaken further, and may even trigger the weak-side Convertibility Undertaking. In such a case, the HKMA would then sell US dollars in exchange for Hong Kong dollars in accordance with the LERS, leading to a corresponding decline in the Aggregate Balance, hence driving Hong Kong dollar interbank rates to gradually increase.

Why TACO?

1/ Trump has a family business to grow.

The world can’t go too chaotic.

(Rich) people can’t hate the Trump brand.

2/ Trump wins by tough negotiations.

This I am not sure. But if two sides are not talking, how could negotiation happen?

If negotiation is not happening… that’s where Trump does the best.

However, if people all believes it’s only negotiation… then it becomes tougher for Trump to gain in negotiation.

That’s why I am not sure.

VC investing and HF investing

I have worked in both industries, venture capital and hedge fund.

I found that sometimes they can be exactly the opposite in how to make money.

While in venture capital, the deals that are more successful are those that are consensus. Capital pile in, and those with capital runs faster, adding to the moat.

While in hedge fund, the stocks that work better are those that are considered un-investable. When other holders cut loss / exit, it creates better risk reward profile and the perfect buying opportunity.

 

When we are saying China needs to boost household consumption

First of all, how large is the gap?

China’s household consumption is 39% of GDP, which is lower than EU average of 52%, 70% in the US, and below world’s average.

That’s about $2.3 trillion (13% x $17.8 trillion 2023 GDP).

Secondly, where are the areas to increase?

If look at GDP composition, China needs to increase in real estate services, healthcare, education, professional & technical services, information & communication, recreation & art, etc.

For real estate services, rent & management fees need to increase…

Healthcare and education is partially public spending. So need more gov budget allocation.

Services is essentially a problem of oversupply right now. Either needs to export or needs to increase demand.

Information & communication.. need to raise software prices.

Recreation & art needs more leisure time.

 

Investing in China: news are not news

If you hear a piece of “news” from China’s mainstream media, that’s not the news anymore. Normally, this “news” can be seen from multiple official outlets in China in similar or even the same words.

Therefore, you can trade on the news anyway; you should assume market has already priced this information.

The reason is that nowadays information transmits super efficiently in China, so little people would be left behind without the exposure to those mainstream “news”. Thus, there is no one you can have information edge over, especially in the market.

Then where/how to get information edge?

1/ by double checking the news with resourceful people. Context will matter a lot and they can help you understand for example whether a change is big / serious or superficial / repetitive.

2/ read the full documents; gather any information that is shortened or simplified in the news

3/ focus on news that is not repeated in other mainstream medias

4/ compare with previously similar events – look for anything that is more or less than before; in other words, result is not important, the difference matters.

 

See others posts

Investing in China: regulation and justice

Investing in China: common fallacy

Bizarre Numbers (4)

New home sales is ~60% of China’s home transaction, according to sqft from official stat. (Source: 全年新建商品房销售面积97385万平方米。二手房交易网签面积71812万平方米)

In the US, in 2024, ~700k new home sales vs. 4mn existing home sales. New home sales is ~15% of US home transactions.

60% vs 15%

FAANG to MAG 7

Netflix was out, Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla are in.

 

When FAANG was first coined, it was 2013. Netflix provided significant return in that mobile Internet and cloud era.

ChatGPT was out in Nov 2022 and swept the world in 2023.

 

Netflix doesn’t touch hardware and AI.

Nvidia was neglected as it’s not close to consumers except for the gaming PC. Later people may know it as a crypto mining machine, but not the backbone of an entire era.

Tesla was neglected as people can easily live without an electric vehicle. Now it seems that autonomous driving will eventually serve many people and be deployed in more use cases in the form of robots.

Microsoft was neglected because it was mature and old? Not sexy.

 

Equity risk premium?

Why not bond risk premium?

Bonds typically have fixed payments but inflation is uncertain. One dollar 10 years from now is very hard to value.

Instead, you can trust credible companies more. They shall hold their position in the economy and take their fair share.

Isn’t that more “certain” in some way?

Thus, why we have equity risk premium.. there should bond risk premium over high quality companies.

Good stock is like iPhone

How much would you need to be paid to switch from iPhone to another smartphone?

For many people, that’s way higher than the $1,000 or so price tag.

iPhone just works.

It’s similar in stocks.

People don’t want to sell good stocks (thus ownership of good companies) even it’s a bit pricer.

They just work.

Why do you want to switch to another company?