Leaders that don’t retire vs leaders who empower others

Following previous posts on BRICS leaders amazingly long tenure, I just realized that other positions may have similar issues.

Those who don’t retire are a group of people!

Non-BRICS country leaders like Trump.

Nvidia Jensen Huang.

Tesla/SpaceX Elon Musk.

Meta Mark Zuckerberg.

Anthropic Dario Amodei.

While Zuckerberg and Amodei are still under 45, others may be challenged on this question.

A healthy organization needs to have good candidates to lead in next era – a good leader needs to empower and mentor a generation of leaders.

George Washington is a good example.

Apple is a good example.

Ten predictions by ChatGPT

 

1. The white-collar employment crisis arrives without a recession

60%

Labor market / society

AI reduces entry-level hiring much faster than it reduces overall employment. Graduate recruitment in consulting, accounting, software, legal services and financial services falls sharply.

The surprise: unemployment remains relatively low, but the traditional career ladder breaks. This creates a political problem that conventional unemployment statistics fail to capture.

Evidence is already emerging: a Dallas Fed study found weaker employment outcomes for graduates from AI-exposed majors, while Census research identified a persistent decline in early-career hiring in exposed industries.

Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas+1

 

2. Private credit experiences its first major liquidity shock

40%

Financial stability

At least one large private-credit vehicle faces redemption requests substantially above its permitted withdrawal limits, forcing gates and material asset markdowns.

The surprise: private credit was supposed to be insulated from daily market volatility. But semi-liquid products have introduced liquidity promises against illiquid assets.

The IMF estimates a roughly $2 trillion direct-lending market, including approximately $300 billion in semi-liquid structures. The Fed has already documented rising redemption requests.

International Monetary Fund+1

 

3. Home insurance becomes the next housing crisis

45%

Real estate / climate

Insurance availability, rather than mortgage rates, becomes the binding constraint on homeownership in certain US regions.

My prediction: multiple regional housing markets experience significant repricing because homeowners cannot obtain affordable insurance, making properties harder to finance and sell.

The GAO already finds inflation-adjusted insurance premium increases of 25% or more in certain high-risk coastal areas during 2019–2024.

U.S. GAO

 

The second-order effect is more important: mortgage collateral becomes less valuable.

4. A food inflation shock arrives despite falling energy prices

40%

Agriculture / geopolitics

The strong El Niño forecast for 2026–27 produces more severe agricultural disruption than markets anticipate.

I expect at least one major food commodity to rise more than 25% from its November 2026 level during 2027, accompanied by export restrictions or emergency food subsidies somewhere in the world.

NOAA expects a strong-to-very-strong El Niño through early 2027. Crop monitoring agencies already identify elevated drought and crop-yield risks in several regions.

Climate Prediction Center+1

 

This could create a surprising divergence: falling oil prices but rising food inflation.

5. The first in-vivo gene-editing medicine gets FDA approval

60%

Biotechnology / medicine

A major milestone in gene editing moves from clinical research into commercial medicine.

Intellia Therapeutics’ lonvo-z, an in-vivo gene-editing candidate for hereditary angioedema, has an FDA priority-review target date of March 10, 2027.

This is potentially a platform milestone: genetic editing inside the human body rather than modifying cells outside the body and returning them to the patient.

SEC

 

The broader surprise would be that the market starts valuing gene editing as a repeatable therapeutic platform rather than a collection of speculative individual drug candidates.

6. Satellite connectivity starts challenging the traditional telecom model

40%

Telecommunications / space

Ordinary smartphones increasingly connect directly to satellites for basic connectivity, without dedicated satellite phones.

By the end of 2027, I expect at least two major mobile markets to establish mainstream direct-to-device offerings.

The important catalyst is the 2027 World Radiocommunication Conference, where international spectrum rules for direct-to-device connectivity will be discussed.

GSMA

 

The longer-term implication: mobile operators may need to rethink the economics of rural coverage and roaming.

7. France triggers a major European sovereign-bond scare

25%

Politics / European integration

The 2027 French presidential election produces a fragmented political outcome and renewed concerns about fiscal sustainability.

My tail scenario: French 10-year government bond spreads over Germany exceed 200 basis points, at least temporarily.

This would not necessarily mean a euro breakup. The more likely consequence would be a new debate over fiscal rules, ECB intervention and European political integration.

France’s election is scheduled for April and May 2027, against an already difficult fiscal backdrop.

Allianz+1

 

8. Deepfake fraud forces a fundamental redesign of digital identity

40%

Cybersecurity / social trust

A major financial fraud involving convincing AI-generated video, voice and identity documents triggers a regulatory response.

Governments and financial institutions increasingly require cryptographic identity verification for high-value transactions and sensitive digital interactions.

The US Treasury has already documented AI-generated identities being used to bypass financial institutions’ customer-identification checks.

U.S. Department of the Treasury

 

The surprise is that the commercial internet may start moving away from trusting what people see and hear toward verifying cryptographic authenticity.

9. The data-center backlash becomes a genuine political movement

60%

Politics / infrastructure

A substantial number of announced data-center projects are delayed or cancelled because local communities oppose higher electricity bills, water usage and environmental costs.

This is already emerging: voters in at least 38 US jurisdictions approved measures restricting data centers in the November 2026 elections.

The Washington Post+1

 

My prediction is that 2027 brings a structural change in permitting, cost allocation and the political conditions required to build AI infrastructure.

The surprise: AI infrastructure growth is constrained by local democratic politics rather than technology or capital.

10. Robotaxis become a real urban transportation competitor

40%

Mobility / automation

Robotaxis move beyond novelty and begin capturing meaningful ride-hailing demand in several cities.

By the end of 2027, I expect at least one major city to see autonomous vehicles become a top-three ride-hailing option by usage.

The foundation is already there: commercial services operated in 15 US cities by September 2026, according to McKinsey.

McKinsey & Company

 

The surprising impact may be on parking, urban transport, vehicle ownership, insurance and the economics of conventional ride-hailing—not simply on automakers.

BRICS leaders don’t retire

Lula won reelection, securing his fourth presidential term with 51.79% of the vote against Flávio Bolsonaro.

What about other leaders

Current leader Years in top leadership* Expected or mandatory exit
Putin 🇷🇺 27 Eligible to serve until 2036
Xi 🇨🇳 14 No formal term limit
Modi 🇮🇳 12 No term limit; next election due 2029
el-Sisi 🇪🇬 12 Current constitutional endpoint 2030
Lula 🇧🇷 12 cumulative Current term ends 2026
Mohammed bin Salman 🇸🇦 9 as Crown Prince No fixed retirement
Ramaphosa 🇿🇦 9 Presidential limit applies
Abiy Ahmed 🇪🇹 9 No PM term limit
Mohamed bin Zayed 🇦🇪 4 as president Unlimited reelection
Pezeshkian 🇮🇷 2 Presidential term limits apply
Prabowo 🇮🇩 2 Maximum two presidential ter

ms

*Putin’s figure includes time as prime ministe; Mohammed bin Salman’s with becoming Crown Prince.

Governments, tax, shareholders

Isn’t governments the invisible shareholder of all corporations?

Say tax is 25% , essentially gov will take 25 of 100 profit before tax, and the rest $75 are called profit after tax and is distributed to shareholders.

Does it sound odd?

Isn’t governments essentially a permanent 25% shareholder of the company, and the ratio is net by itself.

How convenient.

Btw, shareholders are should give their shares a 25% hair cut.. if they own 50% of a company, they just own 37.5% in case of 25% tax.

What concerns me (3)

Is that today’s major platforms like X and TikTok/Douyin can be used as “thought weapons”.

People/organizations can push a post (twit or video) to millions of people if it fits their interest, regardless of who creates the post in the first place.

At certain scale and with enough repetitiveness, this action can alter a person’s or a group of people’s thoughts.

This influence is sold.

People/organizations can buy the influence without disclosing the intention.

Common folks are blindfolded.

It’s not like an influencer wants  more people to see his/her posts to grow impact.

It’s paying for “thought weapons” to achieve certain goals inexplicitly.

And sometimes, these goals could be evil, or self-interested.

Meanwhile, users who “owns” the attention “sell” their attention for nothing; payers pay to the platforms – they are not even bribing the ones that have original ownership.

What concerns me (2)

Is that current companies or leader of companies at the frontier of AI and robotics talks about advancement everyday, but they said little about ethics, at least in the public domain.

Who to provide jobs if factories are run by robotics? and decisions are made without human in the loop?

How to preserve humanity in a world with automatic war machines / weapons?

BTC vs US insterest

I have a theory recently.

From US gov perspective, BTC is actually a threat to USD dominance and potentially US treasury demand.

Thus, US gov actually wants a volatile BTC market that is not very trustworthy.

How to do that?

BTC is designed to be decentralized, and there is no one single entity to tackle down.

MicroStrategy is the answer.

Well many people would be confused. Isn’t MicroStrategy one of the biggest buyers of BTC?

Sure.

But that is designed to be the case, as MicroStrategy needs to be influential in the first place.

However, MicroStrategy needs to add volatility and reduce credibility of BTC.

How to do that?

MicroStrategy added leverage to the game and used dividend tools like STRC.

BTC holders don’t have any obligation. But MicroStrategy now has dividend obligations, supported by a zero-yield asset.

In short, MicroStrategy adds a lot of risk to the system and makes BTC more like a Ponzi game.

That is exactly the goal of US gov.

Maybe that’s why Saylor and Trump are close.