Blog

China is back with good policies. What’s next?

China’s stock market is back. Everyone know.

China rolled out policies to help its stock market & economy. This makes sense.

What are the missing parts?

Some might say geopolitical tension is still an unsolved issue.

I won’t disagree. But I feel it’s not as extreme as before.

Some may say a deeper structural reform.

Fair; but in short term this might not change.

What I think is missing (and China can start to think in short term) is how China can better participate & even organize global affairs & how the world economy can grow better with a stronger China.

Historically, China didn’t excel on this. During times when its economy was leading the world, it didn’t take much care of the world. It could give stuff to nearby countries; it could invent and other can learn; however, it didn’t actively “organize the world”.

A strong economy that can’t lead is a loss to the world, I think.

How to lead? How to make other countries live better as China is a bigger part of global GDP? Not by giving free money but in a healthy, organic way.

That’s the question I haven’t seen much discussion.

Random thought on one-child policy

China implemented one-child policy from 1980 to 2015 (36 years).

This might be the largest social experiment that has ever been done globally.

Only-child policy is rare. Only China has done this.

The impact could be negligible for some families, as they would have had only one child anyway.

But collectively, this has significant impact – e.g. it reduced the population: two ppl turned into one people.

One consequence that many might have ignored – half of the families may “lose” their “last name”.

In China, children usually keep their father’s name. So families with only one girl as their child would “suffer” from this one-child policy.

This might be in China vs. say in the US, as Chinese last names are shared among different families but last names in the US are often unique. If there were one-child policy in the US, ultimately, half of the last names would disappear!

What a loss of culture.

Uninvestable? Part of the game

Sure people can argue they were seeing many absurd things in China over the past couple of years, but in the grand scheme of things, this may also be considered a part of the game.

Just like in some countries, there are various forms of “cost of doing business”.. including developed countries. They are different. So one often needs time to study, and may feel unacceptable.

China is the same; maybe a bit more special – unpredictability of rules is a cost of doing business. Maybe somewhere else, the cost of doing business is “written” in the rules so you know the “cost” before you play. Here, it’s like a higher level of “costs” – changing rules is part of the game & thus this “cost” is hard to calculate/predict. If you can’t calculate costs, and you don’t know the probability, you can’t calculate your return.

However, when you recognize that unpredictability is part of the “game”, then it can become “investable” from time to time.

The “best” player might be able to predict when is investable and when is not.

It’s also okay to be a bit behind. The key is to protect yourself when it’s “uninvestable”, and be reasonably participating when it’s “investable”.

Focus on those periods. You may temporarily forget other “costs”. But you can only pretend that you forget, with a reminder/timer. You have to remember this cost on a deeper level.

The safest period is right after the most dangerous period.


Normally, I prefer not to play poker with Chinese, as they often too good at playing with people.

This doesn’t mean I can’t play. It’s just too energy-consuming.

Smart cars

I have had this concerns about smart cars for quite a few years.

I could be old-school on this, but I like ICE, and I like traditional cars that are not connected / fully controlled by electronics.

The recent Lebanon pager explosions is not only for pagers.

EV batteries could have more powerful explosion.

In addition, EV can move.

More importantly, they can go autonomous.

In some sense, they could become autonomous moving “bombs”, especially if hacked by malicious actors.


Of course, a tank of oil (ICE) can do the same, with some autonomous features.

So it’s really important to build trust between countries and companies.

I don’t know if that’s happening.

A story about elevators

Something I recall vividly – during college, I live in a high-rise on campus. Before we push button on an elevator, we look at what’s already be pressed. If one floor above or one floor below has been pressed, we shall not push button. Instead, we walk the stairs.

This is such a good norm that I follow immediately. This is such a powerful norm that brings positive energy to people.

This is actually faster if you run a bit, as the stair is close to elevators.

More importantly, all passengers’ time combined will be saved.

I have never experienced this in China. For myself, I can’t find stairs actually..

I hope this is not only for elevators and we may replicate this spirit in other areas.

China reported numbers’ discrepancy seems lower

China’s reported number can be very different from reality.

What numbers can you really rely on?

I would assume the number reported today but happened a year ago is more accurate than the number reported last year.

For example, for 2024 Jan to Aug, fixed asset investment rose by 3.4% to 32.94 trillion rmb.

While you need to believe in the current number, it’s more acceptable to me to assume the number for 2023 Jan to Aug is 31.86 trillion rmb [32.94 / (1+ 3.4%)].

Then you can compare with last year’s reported number, and see the discrepancy is -3% – last year’s reported number is 3% higher than current year implied number.

If you do the same for all month since December 2021, you can see the discrepancy grew from 0% for Dec 2021 to -15% for Dec 2022 and now back to only -3% for Aug 2023.

Indeed, the discrepancy has been low for May 2023 to Aug 2023: -4%, -3%, -3%, -3%, which seems to be a good thing.

Japan’s politics

People noticed the market’s volatility on Aug 5 with the yen carry trade, but few discussed the notable changes among the next Japan PM candidates & the pressure on current PM Fumio Kishida.

In early Aug, Kishida seemed failed to secure his party’s support. The meetings on Aug 2 (Friday) between party “leaders” seemed to be a really important time. Other news pointed to the same direction around those days.

The LDP’s internal election dynamics, especially factional operations, determine the outcome. And Taro Aso seems to be a very powerful figure. He is the “King Maker“.

Currently, there are 9 candidates within LDP. We shall know the vote by end of Sep. If no one gets over half of the vote, which is almost certain, then the two with the most votes will enter the runoff. In this runoff, the LDP lawmakers will have a much greater voice so they are determining in the end.

The winner shall be the next Japan PM.

 

100% tariff on China-made electric vehicles.. so what

Nio’s sub brand Onvo just announced its price today.

Without battery, price is 150k rmb, or ~$20k.

If doubling the price due to tariff to $40k, that is still competitive in the US.

Model 3, ID.4 is around that price range in the US (excl. credit).

If counting US gov subsidy, that’s $7.5k price advantage for US-made EV. But this subsidy won’t be here forever.

The point is, even with 100% tariff, it’s not entirely unaffordable for Chinese EV brands.

China’s over-consumption

Over-consumption is ingrained in Chinese culture.

When Chinese people invite other to dinner, they usually over-order to show hospitality. This is over-consumption.

When Chinese people drink liquor on the dinner table, they can push beyond their bodies’ alcohol limit – drinking beyond the limit is usually seen as sincerity and deep friendship. This is over-consumption.

When Chinese people send gifts to each other during holidays, they often send things that are higher end then they consume. This is over-consumption.

The concept of “over-consumption” doesn’t mean it’s not necessary; indeed, those can be seen as “normal” rather than “over-consumption” for most Chinese. It’s only when you compare those consumption levels to countries like US, you can say it’s above the needed/common level.

If Chinese people are going to normalize their consumptions, there can be an oversupply in those categories.

Every Chinese companies’ overseas story needs a regulatory check if involves the US

Every company needs to go through this process.

Ask this question – has the overseas business been challenged?

Quality companies should welcome the challenge and prove themselves to overseas regulators.

Only if the company passes the test, the international story is fair and square.


PDD/Temu is going through this process; the challenge just came up around de minimis exemption.

CALT’s licensing agreements in the US is also being questioned to some extent.

Wuxi Bio is going through this process (US Biosecure Act) and hasn’t proved itself yet.

Beigene is being challenged over IP by Abbvie.

No need to mention ByteDance/TikTok.

etc.


Chinese companies need be prepared to fight uphill battles in overseas if they want the US market. Behaving better then a local company seems to be a minimum; be careful about anything that may seem “unfair” for overseas regulators.