China version of German premium cars

It’s weird to me that the BMW 5 Series, Audi A6, and Benz E Series are priced much cheaper than their foreign original version.

The gap can be 1/3 – BMW 5 Series will cost ~$60k (maybe 8% dealer discount) vs slightly above $40k in China.

They don’t look exactly the same, but the China version will be even “longer” / “larger”.

This is weird again as I would assume bigger cars cost more – e.g. BMW 5 Series is bigger than BMW 3 Series.

I can only assume that the components used in China version are different from the original version, thus cost is lower.

But still, it’s hard to imagine a good things is priced lower in China vs abroad.

Typically, a “real good thing” can be priced higher in China due to large population base and thus is short in supply.


Update

China’s BMW 525Li is weaker than German BMW 520i.

Audi’s and Benz’s is similar performance across China and German.

“Technology”

Technology company isn’t necessarily asset-light.

GE was also a leading “technology” company in its days.

A technology company has no boundary.

It’s a group of brightest minds that bind together and shine wherever they sees darkness.

The TAM expansion is what makes “technology” companies amazing investments.

Tesla is not asset light.

Tesla is a technology company that is expanding its TAM.

Engineers that can only make cars make a company a car company. But if these engineers can do all sorts of designs and create new stuff, they make a tech company.

Why TACO?

1/ Trump has a family business to grow.

The world can’t go too chaotic.

(Rich) people can’t hate the Trump brand.

2/ Trump wins by tough negotiations.

This I am not sure. But if two sides are not talking, how could negotiation happen?

If negotiation is not happening… that’s where Trump does the best.

However, if people all believes it’s only negotiation… then it becomes tougher for Trump to gain in negotiation.

That’s why I am not sure.

Equity risk premium?

Why not bond risk premium?

Bonds typically have fixed payments but inflation is uncertain. One dollar 10 years from now is very hard to value.

Instead, you can trust credible companies more. They shall hold their position in the economy and take their fair share.

Isn’t that more “certain” in some way?

Thus, why we have equity risk premium.. there should bond risk premium over high quality companies.

Adding tariff on drugs is like killing people?

Some people will be priced out if tariff significantly increases drug price.

That to some extent is like “killing” those people.

Of course, prices on drugs shall increase over time for different reasons.

Would you argue that if a drugmaker raises price, it’s “killing” people?

It will be interesting then.. as pharmaceutical companies are saving and killing people at the same time. They are still saving people net net.

For investors in pharma, if they expect higher profits, are they also killing people as companies need to raise price? But if you invest in drugs, you should be saving people right?

What a humanitarian cap on the industry!

Tariff discussion is educational

For many in the US, tariff discussion should be very educational.

For one thing, people now know more about where things are produced and where different parts are coming from.

It asks people to debate what’s really needed to happen in the US and what’s not. And the feasibility of any changes.

Also, without all those analysis and breakdowns, many people probably just complain, but rarely value the importance of global collaborations – that it’s hard to have everything happen in the US.

The entire debate and the prospect of an iPhone city (the whole Boston population is needed) let people understand why those decisions were made in the first place.

The debate is magnified by the financial market. All participants globally need to think about this.

For wealthy people, a more expensive iPhone means nothing. They might see the impact of deglobalization as limited if it’s just things are just getting expensive. But the upheaval and collapse of the financial market will let the wealthy know it’s more than the living cost.

DeepSeek is the poster child of Chinese special situation

DeepSeek provides unparalleled cost-efficiency – cheap and good.

DS is a typical “China” thing, propelled by limited resources – in this case, limited advanced chips.

This is just not the way that US companies usually pursue – US shall go for the best performance, with unlimited resources ideally.

How wonderful the world balances itself.

Music in AI age should focus on memorable experiences

Back in 2016, I saw this day coming – AI is creating music that is really good.

However, I like natural “things”.

How to have more human elements?

I would argue live concerts are more “human”.

The unique performance, the friends and family who join you, the broader audience, even the historical background, could make a concert a more meaningful experience than any song.

That piece of memory is unique – it’s hard to replicate the exact same “experience”. Even if the singer may perform similarly across concerts, the audience is different. And audience is part of the whole performance.