Fundings Versus $800 Billion Tesla & Top 5 US Tech All Have An EV Play

Following up on my post almost 2 years ago – fresh fundings are going to EV makers and autonomous driving.

The check sizes are big – you need billions of dollars to compete with the $800 billion Tesla.

1/ Microsoft + Cruise, $2+ billion

A new investor in the EV space – Microsoft (NASDAQ: MSFT) led the $2+ billion round for GM’s (NYSE: GM) Cruise, with valuation up to $30 billion. Microsoft’s Azure is getting the new customers: GM and Cruise.

Cruise, as a self-driving unit, spent $0.8 billion in operating cash flow in 2019.

At December 31, 2019, external investors held 17.3% of the fully diluted equity in Cruise Holdings. After this funding, GM should still have 77%+ of Cruise.

2/ Rivian, $2.65 billion

The financing is led by T. Rowe Price and the firm is valued at $27.6 billion. This is in addition to the $2.5 billion raised in July 2020.

3/ Lucid Motor, $2 billion (?)

It was reported (rumored) that Lucid Motor will go public via a SPAC deal with Churchill Capital Corp IV (NASDAQ: CCIV), which raised $2.07 billion last year.

The transaction could be valued at up to $15 billion.

CCIV share closed at $17.9 today, or 79% above its blank check ipo price of $10.

If pre-money Lucid is worth $13 billion, then buying CCIV at $17.9 is buying Lucid at over $23 billion.


There were a lot more others, with SPACs. To name a few others – Lordstown Motors (NASDAQ: RIDE) raised $1.175 billion; Luminar (NASDAQ: LAZR) raised $570 million; Fisker (NYSE: FSR) raised $1 billion, etc.

Plus, Apple will make EVs, Alphabet has Waymo, Amazon has Zoox and invested in Rivian. With Microsoft’s deal today and Tesla surpassing Facebook in market cap: now top 5 big tech in the US all have an EV play.


Takeaways:

1/ Cash might be abundant today – cash will be a competitive edge tomorrow.

2/ Covid-19 delayed most EV companies’ production for 1 year – that’s a gift for those who can produce – namely Tesla. The valuation jump includes the unexpected another year ahead.

3/ Top 5 big tech in the US all have an EV play.

Tech Companies Want A Podcast

Spotify (NYSE: SPOT) launched podcast service in 2015. It appears to be the leading podcast provider in 2020.

Podcast listeners are projected to surpass 100 million in 2020 in the US alone, and podcast ads revenue to surpass $1 billion in 2021, according to emarketer.

US Podcast Ad Spending, 2018-2022 (millions and % change)

Spotify launched Spotify Podcast Ads in January 2020.

In November last year, Spotify announced to acquire Megaphone for $235 million. Megaphone offers technology for podcast publishers and advertisers seeking targeted slots on podcasts.

Amazon Music came a bit late – it adds podcasts in September last year.

Apple, an already big player in podcast, seems to plan another route to monetize – a paid subscription service, according The Information today.

On the same day, Tencent Music (NYSE: TME) announced its acquisition of Lazy Audio, which provides audiobooks, and other forms of “podcast-like” audio services.

ByteDance, Kwai and LiZhi (NASDAQ: LIZI) have their own apps for podcast as well.

It’s another round of competition in long-form audio – PGC & UPGC contents will be hot.

Yep, tech companies always want to connect with users longer.

History Is Not A Straight Line Forward: Cannabis, Bitcoin, 3D Printing

History is not a straight line forward.

Setbacks are usual on the road. Plus, it takes time for new ideas to evolve into a better version of itself. As long as it represents a future that’s needed, it will come back from “disillusion”.

Instead of chasing the very new idea, investors looks back and brings past “bubbles” back to life – when they can show some real progress/changes.

Cannabis, Bitcoin and 3D printing are just three examples. It’s interesting to see the cycles forming, although 2-3 years might not be long enough to be called “big cycles”. That’s how the future arrives.

Future ways of living, of production and of how to organize the society are always the areas to invest – but be careful with bumps on the road.


1/ Cannabis

Cannabis stocks had a great performance in the second half of 2018 before they crashed. In the past few month, they are back to life with some 100-200%+ returns.

What has changed? People are expecting the US market to open up as legalization on the federal & states levels is under way. Price stabilizes, oversupply concerns are going away, more consolidation in the industry, and companies post strong growth and healthier gross margin in Q3.

Jan 1, 2017 – Jan 8, 2021 | ~2 years from the previous peak

 

2/ Bitcoin 

Bitcoin was called a “bubble” and is still called a “bubble” today. Bitcoin price hit $20k 3 years ago. Now it’s doubling the previous high to $40k.

What has changed? More people are seeing it as a hedge against USD depreciation as bitcoin’s supply is limited – it’s younger generation’s gold.

Jan 1, 2017 – Jan 8, 2021 | ~3 years from the previous peak

 

3/ 3D printing

3D printing was in a “hype” mode back in 2014 and quickly lost most of its “market cap” afterwards – just like cannabis and bitcoin.

What has changed? During COVID-19, when global supply chain was disrupted, people realized the value of flexibility of 3D printing, especially in medial equipment solutions. The 3D printing companies are also developing more “recurring” business model. With auto and other manufacturing sectors are expected to recover in 2021 and beyond, people are betting on a more “agile” future of the industrial world, with more customization and more flexible capex.

Jan 1, 2012 – Jan 8, 2021 | ~7 years from the previous peak


Charts are created by author, soured from WSJ

Pinduoduo Tragedies & Involution

The first 10 days of 2021 is not usual for Pinduoduo (NASDAQ: PDD): a female employee’s sudden death on her way back to home midnight, widely reported in China + a suicide by jumping from an employee’s home on the 27th floor + firing of a Shanghai-based employee due to posting unwanted messages on Maimai. (see details below)

Pinduoduo is not alone. The three cases, although all about Pinduoduo (NASDAQ: PDD), are the latest extreme illustration of “involution” (内卷), a very popular word in China right now.

To explain it in one sentence, involution = excessive competition with no real growth. It’s mostly used with China’s urban working class and popular in the case of internet companies.

How did involution happen? For internet companies in China:

1/ no more demographic dividend. No easy growth from new handset shipment, MAUs. Growth from lower-tier cities has been explored for the past 2-3 years.

2/ major business models are occupied by established companies. It’s the same across US and China. Rarely a new thing could pop up and sustain (Pinduoduo and ByteDance are years old and becoming “established”). Established companies are disproportionately more powerful. And internet companies are usually more innovative than others.

3/ too big to grow domestically and hard to grow overseas. When those $200bn+ companies want to grow fast, they require more energy and space. China has a big market, but US big techs not only have a large domestic market but can easily participate other markets globally. Southeast Asia is important for China’s tech/internet sector but cannot provide enough TAM.


On a side note, investors globally should start to focus on ESG measures in China.

Leading investors in China should take a lead, be more responsible on values (not just value), and care more about all stakeholders (not just as shareholders).


Three Pinduoduo cases attached:

1. The girl’s death on her way home after working until midnight

The tragedy is well reported in medias (BloombergReuters, etc.). The girl, born in 1998 (22 years old) and joined Pinduoduo (NASDAQ: PDD) in July 2019, collapsed while walking home with colleagues at 1:30 am. She died in the early hours of Dec 29, 2020 in local time – didn’t make it through the new year.

In China, the death quickly get massive public attention and criticism over the internet, as well as the regulator’s probe according to the news.

2. The suicide on Jan 9 by jumping from the 27th floor

The male developer joined Pinduoduo (NASDAQ: PDD) in July 2020. His suicide on Jan 9 (Jan 8, Friday in local time) in Changsha has been confirmed by Pinduoduo and is well-reported in China. It hasn’t been reported much in english so far but here is one from EqualOcean. The details are still unclear.

3. An employee in Shanghai fired on Jan 9 for posting photo

The story is still developing. The fired employee posted a video detailing his experience on social medias, including Bilibili, Weibo and Zhihu. The video is only in Chinese, but here are the major facts he provided:

  • The fired employee joined Pinduoduo (NASDAQ: PDD) as a front-end developer in July 2019, right after graduating from college.
  • On Jan 7 (local time) morning, when he entered the Pinduoduo office building, he saw a male being put on an ambulance in front of the building. He then posted a photo of the ambulance on Maimai, a career social platform in China known for anonymous forum.
  • Somehow, Pinduoduo found out it was him to post the photo anonymously and asked for a “talk” on Jan 8 (local time) afternoon.
  • He was told that he was making Pinduoduo look bad and was asked to sign an agreement that says he will voluntarily quit, confirm that he made certain comments, and not to talk about it after quitting.
  • He refused to sign the agreement and was fired immediately afterwards.

He also confirms some “rumors” about how Pinduoduo treats its employees and the unpleasant working environment, e.g.

  • Employees in Shanghai are implicitly asked to work 300 hours per month; some departments are asked to work up to 380 hours per month
    • It’s much more than the so-called “996” culture; employees mostly get off work around 11pm/12am
  • For any legal holiday that is longer than 3 days, employees are required to get back to work early
  • Employees are asked to move into newly renovated buildings/offices when there is unpleasant/unusual smell in the air

An Update On Jumia: A New Business

Continuing on the last post, I said although some earnings number are not pretty, Jumia has become a different firm in two year.

It was relying heavily on first-party sales (“resell” model like JD.com) which accounted for over 70% of its revenue in 2018Q1. That number decreased overtime to 34% in 2020Q1 (halved), partially due to the coronavirus disruption from Jumia’s own suppliers.

Another way to look at this is on the GMV level. 1st party revenue as % of GMV decreases overtime as well – what is more, the take-rate on the rest of the GMV, where marketplace revenues come from, is improving.

I do believe marketplace revenues (like Alibaba) are more valuable. Thus, Jumia’s has grown its higher-quality revenue overtime. The third-party business has shaped Jumia into a different company (with more valuable revenues).

As JumiaPay keeps growing, it will deliver value just like Alipay.

Another important matrix that is improving significantly is gross profit after fulfillment expense. This value could be used as “gross profit” or even “revenue” to better track the long-term profitability.

Fulfillment expense is not trivial and grows with the GMV as both 1st-party and 3rd-party sales uses Jumia’s delivery network.

And as mentioned in the previous post, African nations are now more willing to use mobile payments due to coronavirus. The improvement in adoption will give Jumia a boost in monetization overtime.


To sum up, three reasons that I believe Jumia is a different company:

    1. higher-quality marketplace revenues are now driving the growth
    2. gross profitability after fulfillment improves meaningfully
    3. pandemic-shaped population will adopt mobile payments & fintech solutions much more easily – trust is forced to build.

An Update On Jumia: In Coronavirus

Jumia is the probably most famous Africa startup in the past few years and went IPO last year.

I wrote about the potential e-commerce giant in a few blogs before.


On May 13, Jumia reported its 2020 Q1 earnings, which also provides a glimpse into African cities under coronavirus.

Source: Google

The market didn’t react positively after the earnings, but some opportunistic expectations had been built in before.

Although some numbers are not ideal and growth seems lackluster, I would argue in the next blog that Jumia has become a very different company than two years ago.

This post summarizes things that appear to be positive for Jumia, from its Q1 earnings and the shareholder letter in April, among other communications:

  • Partnership with Reckitt Benckiser, a global health products manufacturer selling through Jumia,  is financing free shipping nationwide (8 markets that Jumia operates) on all listed products; Jumia takes 0% commission. -> free marketing / user acquisition that ensures a good first online shopping experience; keep logistics team operate
  • Focusing on contactless delivery options & online payments. -> accelerating JumiaPay adoption when cash is still considered important; building trust, also encouraged by governments
  • Providing affordable basic foods and sanitary essentials. -> shaping perception on online shopping to everyday purchases
  • In South Africa, it launched Jumia platform with an assortment of essential products (Reckitt Benckiser and P&G) that can be delivered despite the lockdown (was selling fashions via Zando which is shut down).
  • Jumia Food pivots to grocery delivery
  • Increased demand from sellers to join the Jumia platform as offline distribution channels are largely disrupted – high-profile brands on Jumia Mall, including Coca-Cola and Nigerian Breweries in Nigeria, PepsiCo and Nivea (Beiersdorf) in Egypt.
  • Launched JumiaPay in Tunisia
  • Consumers can purchase game subscriptions or credit for in-app purchases on the JumiaPay app for popular games
  • Advertising services were available across 9 out of 11 countries, compared with 5 at the end of 2019 – in Q1 run campaigns for high-profile brands including Adidas, L’Oreal, Microsoft, Sensodyne and Mondelez
  • Volumes surged in some markets, such as Morocco and Tunisia, while limited in countries such as South Africa and Nigeria
  • The countries that have been the most severely affected by confinement measures have experienced a gradual volume recovery since mid-April, while the countries that saw a surge in volumes continued to experience robust momentum throughout April. Overall, in terms of items sold, we ended the month of April c.3% above the first week of March levels.
  • The United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) in partnership with Jumia Uganda, have launched an online platform – to enable small and medium enterprises to connect with consumers
    • Jumia will use its infrastructure which includes riders trained to provide safe and contactless deliveries, to provide a platform for the vendors to reach customers who are currently under lockdown.
    • Consumers will have the option of giving feedback on the level of satisfaction of both the product and the service through the Jumia Vendor App.
  • Jumia and Mastercard announced a partnership to incentivize the use of cashless payments platforms – consumers who purchase essential products using their Mastercard on the Jumia platform will receive up to a 10 per cent discount on their order

Things that are implying negative developments:

  • The early signs of the COVID-19 disruption were felt in our cross-border operations as a result of manufacturing facility shutdowns in China. Supply chain disruption in China also impacted our local sellers, many of whom source their goods from China.
  • Different forms of confinement measures have been affecting operations to varying degrees, food delivery business, brief closures of warehouse, sellers’ inability to deliver, etc.
  • Currently expect continued GMV weakness over at least the first half of 2020, with better Order and Annual Active Consumers growth, on a year-over-year basis.

 

to be continued…

US Delivery System (3): Automobile & UPS

Industrialization: Automobile

While railway and steamship are useful in long distance delivery, short distance and city delivery system was still relying on manpower and horsepower. Things started to change in the 20th century.

In December 1899, an automobile mail wagon was tested in the US for the first time. Officials cheered the dramatic increase in collection speed and soon postmasters across the country were testing motorized vehicles. Collection times were cut at least in half in most trials. [PostalMuseum]

Driving was not an everyday skill in the early 20th century, so the Post Office asked manufacturers and suppliers to provide drivers along with the vehicles.

United Parcel Service (UPS)

In 1907, the predecessor of United Parcel Service (UPS), American Messenger Company, was founded. The company initially focused on merchant / retail businesses and then pivoted to “common carrier service” in 1922 with acquisition.

UPS bought its first car, a 1913 Model T Ford, and attached a truck bed to its back. By 1915, it was using four autos and five motorcycles, and employing 20 foot messengers.

Ford Model T UPS delivery vehicle in 1921 | Source: Wikipedia

In 1919, it started to use the current name UPS.

After WWII

During the Great Depression of the 1930s and America’s involvement in World War II from 1941–1945, new truck purchases were a low priority at the Post Office Department. As a result, trucks bought in the 1920s and early 1930s were kept on the road longer than expected.  [PostalMuseum]

Fueled by the boom of the auto industry, industrialization again revolutionized the delivery system and further expanded the ability of settlement in less connected lands across the US.

Post war, the family car played a central role in suburban life; the number of cars on the road increased from 25.8 million in 1945 to 61.7 million by 1960. America’s growing dependence on automobiles and the growth of the suburbs pushed the Post Office Department to change how it transported and delivered mail. Passenger trains — which had transported most mail since the 19th century — declined, as more and more people chose the open road over the railroad. [USPS]

The first Highway Post Office bus was inaugurated on February 10, 1941. A second route was not established until 1946 due to the outbreak of World War II.

Highway Post Office Bus | Source: postalmuseum

Highway Post Office routes were organized on round trips which averaged about 150 miles each way. There was a very good reason for this, as the bus generally could only hold enough gas for about one 150 mile trip, and fuel stops meant losing valuable time.

Three-wheeled vehicles like Mailster were tested in half a dozen cities beginning in June 1950. By the end of the decade, more than 5,700 Mailsters were in service; the number peaked in 1966, at about 17,700 nationwide.

Mailster, 1964 | Source: USPS

US Delivery System (2): Railway & Steamship

Industrialization: Railway & Steamship

Postal system has its political importance, which is why it’s included in the constitution. As the US expanded, how information / news / mails were transmitted were directly influencing the limit of a united society.

The Railway mail service began as early as November 1832. In 1835, railroads accounted for only one percent of mail transportation and connected only two major cities – Washington and Baltimore.

On July 7, 1838, Congress declared all railroads to be post roads and enabled the railways to make contracts as long as sending mail by rail cost no more than 25 percent above transporting it by stagecoach.

But it’s the industrialization that enabled the US to include / connect California and other lands that are far away from the initial states.

In 1848, US acquired California at the end of the Mexican War. Under the  Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Mexico also recognized the U.S. annexation of Texas, and agreed to sell California and the rest of its territory north of the Rio Grande for $15 million plus the assumption of certain damages claims.

In November 1848, Postmaster General Cave Johnson dispatched a special agent to California to establish Post Offices. By Christmas, steamships were carrying mail from New York to California via the Isthmus of Panama. This was before the construction of the canal. When the ships reached Panama, the mail was taken off and transported in canoes or on pack animals – and later by railroad – about 50 miles to the Pacific coast. Another steamship collected the mail on the Pacific side and headed north.

Map showing mail routes that steamships traveled along the Atlantic Coast, from New York south to Charleston, Savannah, Havana, New Orleans, and on to Panama. On the Pacific side, the mail route followed the coast from Panama north to Oregon, with stops in Mexico and California.
The first U.S. Mail traveled to California by steamship, via the Isthmus of Panama, in 1848 | Source: USPS

Congress authorized funding for the overland routes not because they brought any financial profit to the Post Office Department or the federal government, but because they helped build and bind together a nation.

Also briefly mentioned in 一朝风雨一代王:Sears, Walmart, Amazon, the expansion of the US rail transportation contributed to the growth of USPS (Post Office Department at the time).

Map railroads 1870
Source: gorhistory.com
Map railroads 1890
Source: gorhistory.com 

In 1862, mail was sorted en route, as a train moved between two points, using converted baggage cars.

On August 28, 1864, the first U.S. Railway Post Office (RPO) route was established officially.

By the early 1900s, railroads were critical to postal operations. Like Union Station in Washington, D.C., located adjacent to the City Post Office Building, the Post Office Department ordered that all new main post offices in large cities be built as near as possible to the principal railroad station.

Jumia And Africa E-commerce (3): JumiaPay

JumiaPay is a very natural business choice as we see the success of Alipay, spun out of Alibaba.

This is also the reason MasterCard expanded collaboration and invested €50 million last year.

In Jumia’s 19Q2 press release:

… expanded the scope of JumiaPay beyond our physical goods marketplace. As of December 31, 2018, JumiaPay was only available within our physical goods marketplace. It is now also available within our on-demand services, Jumia Food, and hotel booking portals, Jumia Travel, in selected countries.

…we continued to expand the range of financial and digital services available from third parties, powered by JumiaPay, offering our consumers an increasing range of relevant every day services.

In Nigeria for instance, consumers can now access micro-loans offered
by a local fintech startup, alongside event tickets offered by a local event ticketing provider.

In Egypt, in the second quarter of 2019, we started distributing services from a local deals provider allowing consumers to purchase their vouchers on the Jumia platform, using JumiaPay.

Not surprisingly, 2019 has been a good year for JumiaPay, with quarterly TPV ( Total Payment Volume) growing constantly and annual TPV of ~€124 million.

TPV as a percentage of Jumia’s GMV,  grew from 8.6% in 19Q1 to 15.1% in 19Q4. (update: GMV before adjustment)

Meanwhile, the value per transaction on JumiaPay is lower than its value per order on Jumia, which makes sense as JumiaPay is more user in every day purchases.

In 19Q4, €19 per transaction is roughly half of the Jumia order value (€36).

JumiaPay provides a hyper-growth opportunity.

In the Q4 press release, it says “the ramp-up of JumiaPay on-platform is attributable to our continuous education efforts of consumers, the expanding range of digital services offered as part of our JumiaPay app as well as a number of newly introduced marketing initiatives. These include Mastercard Tuesdays discounts, cash-backs funded by card issuing banks or the possibility to pay for purchases in 12-month installments at no interest, offered by partner banks. “

「News of the Week」Court Rules: Privately Operated Internet Platforms Free To Censor Content They Don’t Like.

WSJ – Tech Platforms Aren’t Bound by First Amendment, Appeals Court Rules

Despite YouTube’s ubiquity and its role as a public-facing platform, it remains a private forum, not a public forum subject to judicial scrutiny under the First Amendment

– Circuit Judge M. Margaret McKeown

Dots to connect: internet platforms’ products that operate like government, possible platforms with political views,  regulation vs. indirect influence on tech firms, etc.